Abstract:1,3-dimethylamylamine (DMAA) is a common additive in sport supplements that was banned by the FDA in 2013. Specifically, this additive received much publication for its role in causing adverse cardiovascular events, particularly sudden cardiac death. However, it has been our experience that products containing this additive may also lead to acute liver injury and liver failure. We present a series of seven cases encountered by a military treatment facility in Southern California which involved the use of OxyEL… Show more
“…These findings suggest that DMAA may have potential to be abused. The serious adverse effects associated with DMAA (Eliason et al, 2012; Foley et al, 2014; Forrester, 2013; Young et al, 2012) may increase the risk of recreational use. Because DMAA produced discriminative stimulus and rewarding effects similar to abused psychostimulants, vulnerable individuals may be at risk of escalating doses to dangerously toxic levels, suggesting that restricting access to this compound may be appropriate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More serious and life-threatening effects have also been reported, such as hemorrhagic stroke (Gee, 2010; 2012; Young et al, 2012), hepatotoxicity (Foley et al, 2014), myocardial infarction (Smith et al, 2014), and death (Eliason et al, 2012). Generally, DMAA is not taken alone, but as a component of weight-loss supplements, several of which also contain caffeine (Lammie, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the pressor action and widespread use of caffeine, a synergistic effect between DMAA and caffeine may be responsible for some of the adverse effects reported (Nurminen et al, 1999). As a result of these adverse effects, DMAA has caught the attention of regulatory agencies worldwide, with New Zealand fully removing it from the market in 2012 (Eliason et al, 2012), and the Food and Drug Administration banning its use as an ingredient in dietary supplements in 2013 (Foley et al, 2014). …”
Background
Dimethylamylamine (DMAA) is a component of many dietary supplements and has recently been associated with numerous adverse effects, prompting the US military and World Anti-Doping Agency to ban its use as a supplement. The current study aimed to elucidate the abuse liability profile of DMAA.
Methods
Dose-response studies of DMAA were performed with Swiss-Webster mice in locomotor and conditioned place-preference assays. The discriminative stimulus effects of DMAA were investigated in Sprague-Dawley rats trained to discriminate either cocaine or methamphetamine from saline.
Results
DMAA produced dose-dependent locomotor depression and fully substituted for cocaine and partially substituted for methamphetamine. In the conditioned place-preference assay, DMAA produced an inverted-U-shaped dose-response curve, with intermediate doses producing significant place preference.
Conclusions
The cocaine- and methamphetamine-like discriminative stimulus effects and the conditioned place preference produced by DMAA suggest that is has potential for abuse. These findings in combination with reports of substantial adverse effects of DMAA in humans suggest that control of DMAA may warrant further consideration.
“…These findings suggest that DMAA may have potential to be abused. The serious adverse effects associated with DMAA (Eliason et al, 2012; Foley et al, 2014; Forrester, 2013; Young et al, 2012) may increase the risk of recreational use. Because DMAA produced discriminative stimulus and rewarding effects similar to abused psychostimulants, vulnerable individuals may be at risk of escalating doses to dangerously toxic levels, suggesting that restricting access to this compound may be appropriate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More serious and life-threatening effects have also been reported, such as hemorrhagic stroke (Gee, 2010; 2012; Young et al, 2012), hepatotoxicity (Foley et al, 2014), myocardial infarction (Smith et al, 2014), and death (Eliason et al, 2012). Generally, DMAA is not taken alone, but as a component of weight-loss supplements, several of which also contain caffeine (Lammie, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the pressor action and widespread use of caffeine, a synergistic effect between DMAA and caffeine may be responsible for some of the adverse effects reported (Nurminen et al, 1999). As a result of these adverse effects, DMAA has caught the attention of regulatory agencies worldwide, with New Zealand fully removing it from the market in 2012 (Eliason et al, 2012), and the Food and Drug Administration banning its use as an ingredient in dietary supplements in 2013 (Foley et al, 2014). …”
Background
Dimethylamylamine (DMAA) is a component of many dietary supplements and has recently been associated with numerous adverse effects, prompting the US military and World Anti-Doping Agency to ban its use as a supplement. The current study aimed to elucidate the abuse liability profile of DMAA.
Methods
Dose-response studies of DMAA were performed with Swiss-Webster mice in locomotor and conditioned place-preference assays. The discriminative stimulus effects of DMAA were investigated in Sprague-Dawley rats trained to discriminate either cocaine or methamphetamine from saline.
Results
DMAA produced dose-dependent locomotor depression and fully substituted for cocaine and partially substituted for methamphetamine. In the conditioned place-preference assay, DMAA produced an inverted-U-shaped dose-response curve, with intermediate doses producing significant place preference.
Conclusions
The cocaine- and methamphetamine-like discriminative stimulus effects and the conditioned place preference produced by DMAA suggest that is has potential for abuse. These findings in combination with reports of substantial adverse effects of DMAA in humans suggest that control of DMAA may warrant further consideration.
“…In addition, an updated causality score using the standardized Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) was calculated for each case and implicated agent by manuscript authors in 2015 (14). By convention, RUCAM scores are grouped into likelihood levels as “excluded” (≤ 0), “unlikely” (1–2), “possible” (3–5), “probable” (6–8) and “highly probable” (> 8). In subjects with 2 or more implicated drugs or HDS products, an overall causality score was assigned to the case and then a causality score was also determined for each individual suspect drug or HDS product.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In mid to late 2013, over 40 cases of severe acute hepatitis and liver failure were linked to the use of the “Super Thermo” formulation of OxyELITE Pro, primarily amongst individuals residing in Hawaii (5–8). The etiology and risk factors for hepatotoxicity amongst these patients remain under investigation.…”
BACKGROUND/AIMS
Herbal and dietary supplement (HDS) hepatotoxicity is increasingly being reported in the United States. This case series describes the presenting clinical features and outcomes of 7 patients with liver injury attributed to OxyELITE Pro enrolled in the Drug Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) study.
METHODS
The 6 month outcomes of patients with hepatotoxicity attributed to OxyELITE Pro enrolled in the DILIN prospective registry between 2004 and 2015 are presented.
RESULTS
Six of the 7 patients (86%) presented in 2013 with symptoms of hepatitis and acute hepatocellular injury. The median duration of OxyELITE Pro use was 18 weeks (range: 5 to 102 weeks). Median age was 36 years (range: 28 to 62), 86% were female, and 43% were Asian. One patient had rash, none had eosinophilia and 3 had antinuclear antibody reactivity. The median peak ALT was 2242 U/L, alkaline phosphatase 284 U/L and bilirubin 15.0 mg/dL. Six patients (86%) were hospitalized, 3 developed acute liver failure and 2 underwent liver transplantation. DILIN causality scores for OxyELITE Pro were definite in 1, highly likely in 3, probable in 2, and possible in 1. Four of the 5 patients without liver transplant recovered completely within 6 months while one patient had mild residual ALT elevations.
CONCLUSIONS
Seven cases of severe acute hepatocellular injury attributed to OxyELITE Pro are reported. These results reinforce the need to assess for HDS supplement use in patients presenting with unexplained acute hepatitis and point to the need for additional regulatory oversight of HDS products.
Performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs) have been used by athletes for as long as sporting competitions have existed. To protect the health and safety of athletes and promote fair play, banned substance lists were developed that include several classes of PEDs. Evidence shows that a majority of athletes use dietary supplement products to aid their training and support their health. Evidence also indicates that use of some dietary supplements carries a risk because the products may contain banned PEDs. Consumers and athletes should weigh a number of considerations before purchasing and consuming dietary supplements to protect their health, reputation, and the spirit of fair competition.The American Medical Association designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™ available through the AMA Ed Hub TM . Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.Why Performance-Enhancing Drug Use Matters Performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs) have been used by athletes for decades, even centuries. To promote fair play-an issue precipitated by the death of an athlete-the International Olympic Committee (IOC) in 1967 banned the use of PEDs, established a new Medical Commission, and created a list of banned substances. 1 Mandatory testing of all athletes began at the 1968 Olympic Games, and drug-testing programs were initiated all over the world in the following years to further promote fair play and to safeguard the health and safety of athletes. 2
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.