1965
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-62-3-509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experience with Long-term Intermittent Hemodialysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
3

Year Published

1966
1966
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
14
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the first paper on shorter dialysis duration, Schupak and Merrill [7] reported a markedly higher rate of hypertension problems than in the early reports with longer dialysis [5,6] . The French Dialysis Registry reported a gradual decrease in hemodialysis duration during the 1970s and a higher rate of hypotensive episodes [25] .…”
Section: Early Reportsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the first paper on shorter dialysis duration, Schupak and Merrill [7] reported a markedly higher rate of hypertension problems than in the early reports with longer dialysis [5,6] . The French Dialysis Registry reported a gradual decrease in hemodialysis duration during the 1970s and a higher rate of hypotensive episodes [25] .…”
Section: Early Reportsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schupak and Merrill [7] indicated that shorter dialysis sessions (total duration of 12-16 h/week with the use of coil dialyzers) achieved biochemical control similar to that achieved on Kiil dialyzers with longer dialysis durations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early reports indicated that the prevalence of itching among patients with chronic renal failure was be tween 0 and 33% [1][2][3][4][5][6]. More recent studies of nondialyzed chronic renal failure patients indicate a prevalence as high as 40% [7], While itching was almost always present among patients on chronic hemodialysis in the 1960s [8][9][10][11][12], its prevalence seems to have declined to a lower yet still significant level in that population [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effective haemodialysis is generally agreed to improve or stabilise the neuropathy and in some early cases complete recovery can occur.59-62 A few reports suggest that haemodialysis is ineffective. 63 Occasional worsening of neuropathy following haemodialysis probably reflects inadequate dialysis and suggests that dialysis time should be increased.65 66 Increasing dialysis frequency without increasing dialysis time is ineffective.6768 A recent report suggests that in addition to dialysis time the mean blood urea level should be considered.69 Deficiency of vitamin B,2 with dialysis must also be suspected in dialysis failure.6' A few reports raise the issue that lack of removal of "middle molecules" may result in persistence of symptoms.70 7' Peritoneal dialysis, and in particular, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, may be superior to haemodialysis in controlling uraemic neuropathy. 72 Renal transplantation has produced a clear cut improvement in virtually all cases in a period of six to twelve months.73-75 One study has demonstrated that modifying the diet by reducing protein and fluid intake will allow reduction in the frequency of dialysis without deleterious effect on the neuropathy.62 Recently, biotin is showing some promise as a therapeutic agent.76…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%