2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0010-7824(02)00392-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experience with GyneFIX® insertions in Spain: favorable acceptance of the intrauterine contraceptive implant with some limitations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A working group of Spanish professionals (GESEG), formed specifically with the aim of studying the frameless IUD, conducted a prospective, multicenter, observational study of GyneFix in 1684 women 25. The study focused on difficulties encountered during the insertion procedure and symptoms experienced during insertion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A working group of Spanish professionals (GESEG), formed specifically with the aim of studying the frameless IUD, conducted a prospective, multicenter, observational study of GyneFix in 1684 women 25. The study focused on difficulties encountered during the insertion procedure and symptoms experienced during insertion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following training, providers can improve their skills and create confidence in the anchoring technique by using the home uterine model (Figure 13) before they start insertions in their patients. Unfortunately, this highly useful training material has only been available in recent years and this is one of the weaknesses that resulted in a number of failed insertions and early expulsions in two studies reported in this paper 19,25…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in agreement with clinical experience, which shows that the majority of cases of perforation is detected during the learning process, and occur exclusively in connection with insertion. The highest rate that has been observed is 1.4/1000, but this rate fell to approximately 1/1000 with increasing experience 32 . At least one perforation has occurred, which was attributed to migration of the IUS 33 .…”
Section: Side‐effectsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, migration seems only possible if a partial perforation occurred at the time of insertion. As the IUS is frameless and flexible, it is unlikely that the device is forced through the uterine wall by uterine contractions, as has been suggested as a possible mechanism of perforation with framed IUDs 32 …”
Section: Side‐effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation