1986
DOI: 10.1016/s0278-2391(86)80092-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experience with a polymer glenoid fossa prosthesis for partial or total temporomandibular joint reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These high stresses may be explained by decreases in superior contact force and increases in posterior contact force at the prosthetic TMJ. Increased contact stress at the prosthetic TMJ increases potential for component wear and material failure or TMJ dislocation [6,38]. Our findings indicate that correctly align ing the condylar component in the anterior-posterior direction and ensuring that the contacting surfaces are congruent intraoperatively may be a critical factor in implant performance and longevity.…”
Section: Musclementioning
confidence: 77%
“…These high stresses may be explained by decreases in superior contact force and increases in posterior contact force at the prosthetic TMJ. Increased contact stress at the prosthetic TMJ increases potential for component wear and material failure or TMJ dislocation [6,38]. Our findings indicate that correctly align ing the condylar component in the anterior-posterior direction and ensuring that the contacting surfaces are congruent intraoperatively may be a critical factor in implant performance and longevity.…”
Section: Musclementioning
confidence: 77%
“…Kent introduced the total TMJ prosthesis. Between 1981 and 1990 several thousand patients were implanted with what then became known as the Vitek-Kent prosthesis [17]. In the early 1980s, Sonnenburg developed a total TMJ replacement in Eastern Germany.…”
Section: Historical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various flaps and materials have been used to replace the missing or destroyed disc but none have been particularly successful. 4,5 The use of alloplastic materials for TMJ reconstruction fell into disuse in the 1970s as a result of problems with the Kent ⁄ Vitek prosthesis 6,7 which caused many foreign body reactions to the proplast and teflon used in the manufacture of the glenoid fossa component of the prosthesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%