Day 1 Wed, April 18, 2018 2018
DOI: 10.2118/191344-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experience Using Managed Pressure Cementing Techniques with Riserless Mud Recovery and Controlled Mud Level in the Barents Sea

Abstract: The Barents Sea offers unique drilling challenges related to issues such as biogenetic gas in shallow formations, thermogenic gas seeps up to the seabed from underlying formations, shallow formations with abnormal pressure, shallow reservoirs, low-fracture-pressure formations in part of the overburden, and naturally fractured/karstified carbonate reservoirs. This paper discusses cementing challenges when drilling wells in the Barents Sea and the experience gained using managed pressure cementing (MPC) practice… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Shell reported that total losses were observed in each of the six wells when drilling in carbonates in Sarawak (Peninsular Malaysia) [30]. Similar problems exist on the Norwegian Continental Shelf when drilling into open fractures or karsts resulted in total losses during a week [20,31,32]. Two to four weeks of non-productive time were reported by an operator company in Qatar when a large volume of cement was pumped to plug intervals of mud losses in carbonates [33].…”
Section: Karstification Objectsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Shell reported that total losses were observed in each of the six wells when drilling in carbonates in Sarawak (Peninsular Malaysia) [30]. Similar problems exist on the Norwegian Continental Shelf when drilling into open fractures or karsts resulted in total losses during a week [20,31,32]. Two to four weeks of non-productive time were reported by an operator company in Qatar when a large volume of cement was pumped to plug intervals of mud losses in carbonates [33].…”
Section: Karstification Objectsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…It has been shown that caves less than λ 4 (40 m (131 ft)) cannot be separated due to wave interference [19]. In certain regions in the Barents Sea, encountered caves were less than a meter and they were very dangerous for drilling [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As reported in [26], the exact geometrical size of the karst is unknown. However, its interpretation from the borehole image defined the geometrical size as more than 50 cm in length with a circumference of 21.6 cm (8.5 section of the well).…”
Section: Geological Signs Of Karstificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a better understanding of karst objects and their effects on drilling, we refer interested readers to the studies in [24][25][26] on drilling in karstified carbonates in the Loppa High region in the Barents Sea which classify karstification objects into dangerous and not dangerous for drilling.…”
Section: Geological Signs Of Karstificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reynolds et al [11] presented a pioneering case study for the Luiperd Mine and one of the measures for reducing environmental risk was to adopt a new articulation tool to minimize the bending stress applied to the subsea wellhead running tool (WHRT) and landing rope in running through the inflow pipe and surface casing. Claudey et al [12] employed a controlled mud level technique in the Barents Sea, which controlled the liquid position within the riser, optimized the downhole pressure, prevented mud leakage, and maintained pressure balance. Claudey et al [13] successfully deployed a riserless mud recovery (RMR) system at a water depth of 854 m, the deepest operation of its kind in the North Sea to date.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%