Experience sampling methodology in mental health research: new insights and technical developments

Abstract

In the mental health field, there is a growing awareness that the study of psychiatric symptoms in the context of everyday life, using experience sampling methodology (ESM), may provide a powerful and necessary addition to more conventional research approaches. ESM, a structured self-report diary technique, allows the investigation of experiences within, and in interaction with, the real-world context. This paper provides an overview of how zooming in on the micro-level of experience and behaviour using ESM adds new insights and additional perspectives to standard approaches. More specifically, it discusses how ESM: a) contributes to a deeper understanding of psychopathological phenomena, b) allows to capture variability over time, c) aids in identifying internal and situational determinants of variability in symptomatology, and d) enables a thorough investigation of the interaction between the person and his/her environment and of real-life social interactions. Next to improving assessment of psychopathology and its underlying mechanisms, ESM contributes to advancing and changing clinical practice by allowing a more fine-grained evaluation of treatment effects as well as by providing the opportunity for extending treatment beyond the clinical setting into real life with the development of ecological momentary interventions. Furthermore, this paper provides an overview of the technical details of setting up an ESM study in terms of design, questionnaire development and statistical approaches. Overall, although a number of considerations and challenges remain, ESM offers one of the best opportunities for personalized medicine in psychiatry, from both a research and a clinical perspective.

Fluctuations in Affective States and Self-Efficacy to Resist Non-Suicidal Self-Injury as Real-Time Predictors of Non-Suicidal Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors

“…Providing greater clarity regarding shortterm (proximal) predictors requires a specific research design that takes an individualized ideographic approach (i.e., risk stratification at the within-person level) as well as intensive monitoring to capture momentary processes that explain imminent risk of NSSI. Fortunately, the recent proliferation of new technologies and smartphone-based apps have now made it feasible to use experience sampling methods to study NSSI and its real-time predictors in daily life (22).…”

Digital technology in psychiatry: towards the implementation of a true person-centered care in psychiatry?

“…Based on these real-time longitudinal data, potentially strengthened with passive sensing information, meaningful patterns of variation in symptoms as well as relevant risk and resilience factors can be identified for each individual person. This provides both clinician and service user with a much better understanding of the problems as well as potential personalized targets for treatment [8]. Using digital tools in this way puts the field of psychiatry nicely in line with the communication of the European Research Commission on Digital Health and Care, emphasizing that digital health should empower service users to monitor their health, adapt their life-style and provides them with a tool to interact as active partners with their clinical carers.…”

“…Digital tools offer a unique opportunity to collect that information. Digital apps, based on structured diary methods such as the experience sampling method [8], provide the means to systematically collect self-report data on thoughts, feelings, symptoms, as well as context in the flow of daily life. Based on these real-time longitudinal data, potentially strengthened with passive sensing information, meaningful patterns of variation in symptoms as well as relevant risk and resilience factors can be identified for each individual person.…”

The Practicalities and Perils of Ambulatory Assessment's Promise: Introduction to a Special Section

“…Smartphones, GPS trackers, and digital wearables offer possibilities previously considered unimaginable. Scholars increasingly characterize these and other emerging tools as opportunities to move the boundaries of what is considered feasible in research (Miller, ; Myin‐Germeys et al., ). Arguably, nowhere is this more relevant than in the study of adolescent development—where ambulatory assessment (AA) methods offer an unequaled lens for observing youths’ ever‐changing lives, multiple environments, changing social expectations, and complex relationship dynamics.…”