“…For Study 1, ESM effect sizes tend to be small (based on a combination of the analysis focusing on within-individual variance only, combined with the short time frames [e.g., several hours] over which relationships are investigated; Lin, Chang, et al, 2021; Lin, Poulton, et al, 2021; Puranik et al, 2021; Shockley et al, 2021; Tang, Ilies, et al, 2021). Thus, we agree with Gabriel et al (2019, p. 976) who warn “against automatic negative reactions to small within-person effect sizes” in ESM studies because while the effects may appear small, they also manifest within a short amount of time (see also Koopman & Dimotakis, in press). Plus, relationships in the experimental studies were based on a single episode such as a recalled event or a writing task, which should have smaller effects.…”