Seventh International Conference on Composition-Based Software Systems (ICCBSS 2008) 2008
DOI: 10.1109/iccbss.2008.32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experience Report on the Construction of Quality Models for Some Content Management Software Domains

Abstract: In previous work, we proposed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, subcharacteristics that correspond to functionality and are not identified in [12]. These subcharacteristics are Contents Verifiabiliness, Media Management and Agenda Management.…”
Section: Form Textmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the one hand, subcharacteristics that correspond to functionality and are not identified in [12]. These subcharacteristics are Contents Verifiabiliness, Media Management and Agenda Management.…”
Section: Form Textmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Therefore, this is the natural place to group the classifiers for CMS functionality. As starting point for the decomposition of Suitability, we used the ISO/IEC-9126-1-based quality model for the CMS domain that we proposed in [12].…”
Section: The Cataloguementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, they provided guidelines to customize the ISO for software components. Additionally, some experiences on establishing and adapting software QMs can be found in Calero et al (2007), Franch et al (2008, Behkamal, Kahani and Akbari (2009), Villalba, Fernández-Sanz and Martínez (2010), Kläs, Lampasona and Münch (2011).…”
Section: Quality Model Establishmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, it can be useful to specify requirements of CES, to serve as baseline for the establishment and application of metrics, to support evaluation of software products of CES, and as an initial reference for constructing specific QMs for organizations, projects, and phases of projects. As we do not expect to cover specific applications domains in which CES have been employed, the level of abstraction of our QM lies between general QMs, such as the proposed by ISO/IEC 25010 (2011), Dromey (1995), Boehm, Brown andLipow (1976), McCall, Richards andWalters (1977), Lochmann and Goeb (2011)) and domain-oriented QMs (e.g., the proposed by Franch et al (2008), Behkamal, Kahani and Akbari (2009), Villalba, Fernández-Sanz and Martínez (2010), Kim and Lee (2009). Hence, our QM is composed of a subset quality characteristics of ISO/IEC 25010 (2011), as QMs must be reduced to eliminate redundancy and increase its efficiency (VILLALBA; FERNÁNDEZ-SANZ; MARTÍNEZ, 2010).…”
Section: Quality Model For Critical Embedded Systems (Qm4ces)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, a compound classifier Content Management System was added to the root. As starting point for the decomposition of Content Management System, the ISO/IEC-9126-1-based quality model for the CMS domain (proposed by Franch et al [177]) was used. Although, some changes were needed in order to accommodate some of the F-SRPs.…”
Section: Text Input Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%