2014 21st Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference 2014
DOI: 10.1109/apsec.2014.37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experience on a Microservice-Based Reference Architecture for Measurement Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These can be used for mapping, enrichment, and evaluations, for example. The structure is comparable to the reference architecture described by Vianden et al…”
Section: Microservice Setup In Winnermentioning
confidence: 71%
“…These can be used for mapping, enrichment, and evaluations, for example. The structure is comparable to the reference architecture described by Vianden et al…”
Section: Microservice Setup In Winnermentioning
confidence: 71%
“…This approach misses the detection component, which is the major focus of our approach, but additionally focuses on a broader set of concerns than just those that can be modeled in component models. Vianden et al [22] report on a study of a microservice-based reference architecture as a starting point for enterprise measurement infrastructures. This can be seen as an alternative to a reconstruction effort, but it requires manual maintenance of the architecture in relation to the reference architecture -which could, e.g., be provided by one of the approaches reported in our paper.…”
Section: Related Work On Microservice Architecturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e decentralization principle and lightweight communication agreements adopted are more flexible than ESB, which makes possible more accurate service optimization plans after service simplification, improves system maintainability, and shortens product iteration cycle for the upgrading need of the Internet era. For some scholars [15], the cost of MSA service governance and service granularity promotion must keep balance, and distributed development means larger challenges for teams, requiring higher technical costs.…”
Section: Granularity Of Microservicesmentioning
confidence: 99%