2013
DOI: 10.1177/1457496913491208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experience of structural onlay allografts for the treatment of bone deficiency in revision total hip arthroplasty

Abstract: The use of the cortical onlay allografts provides a feasible option for restoring the integrity of the proximal femur in revision total hip arthroplasty, but the complication rate is high, particularly in female patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(38 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After a mean follow-up of 13.2 years, only 7 mechanical failures had occurred, and the survival rate of the stem at 16 years was greater than 95%. Recent studies have reported similar low re-revision rates for extensively porous-coated stems in revision THA that range from 0 to 15% after a mean follow-up of 2.1 to 16.1 years [6,[9][10][11][12][27][28][29][30][31][32]. (Table 4) However, the application of extensively porous-coated stems alone in revision THA with type III and IV defects remains a concern because the residual diaphyseal bone may be unable to provide secure stability for the stems [7,8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…After a mean follow-up of 13.2 years, only 7 mechanical failures had occurred, and the survival rate of the stem at 16 years was greater than 95%. Recent studies have reported similar low re-revision rates for extensively porous-coated stems in revision THA that range from 0 to 15% after a mean follow-up of 2.1 to 16.1 years [6,[9][10][11][12][27][28][29][30][31][32]. (Table 4) However, the application of extensively porous-coated stems alone in revision THA with type III and IV defects remains a concern because the residual diaphyseal bone may be unable to provide secure stability for the stems [7,8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…(Table 4) However, the application of extensively porous-coated stems alone in revision THA with type III and IV defects remains a concern because the residual diaphyseal bone may be unable to provide secure stability for the stems [7,8]. Cortical strut allografts can support and provide initial stability for extensively porouscoated stems and can also be used for the treatment of bone deficiency in revision THA [9,11,32]. While the short-term results of extensively porous-coated stems combined with cortical strut allografts in revision THA with femoral bone defects have been encouraging, [9][10][11] few studies have reported longer follow-up results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations