Experience in the use of calvarial bone grafts in orbital reconstruction

Ilankovan, V.; Jackson, Ian T.

doi:10.1016/0266-4356(92)90077-v

Cited by 109 publications

(54 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…[9,10] The major donor sites include crista iliaca, calvarium, maxilla and mandible. [11][12][13][14] Autologous bone graft is applied in orbital reconstruction because of its strength, rigidity, biocompatibility, vascularization potential, and incorporation into the orbital tissue with minimal acute and chronic immune reactivity. The advantages mentioned above make it a significant role in the stage of orbital Figure 1: Multiple small plates of calvarial bone and screws were used to re-create the normal contour of the orbit.…”

Section: Biomaterialsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Materials to facilitate orbital reconstruction and soft tissue filling in posttraumatic orbital deformaties

Ye¹,

Sun²,

Zhang³

et al. 2016

PAR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Posttraumatic orbital reconstruction has been a challenging mission for decades in craniomaxillofacial surgery. Complications like enophthalmos, diplopia and gaze obstacles emerge when orbital trauma occurs, affecting people's daily life as well as their appearance. Advances in technology and research gained through years of experience has provided us with a greater understanding of the changes following trauma, as well as providing us with a variety of filling materials that we can choose from to handle the deformities. However, the best type of material for repair of orbital deformities remains controversial. This paper reviewed approximately 60 articles discussing materials used in orbital reconstruction or soft tissue defect filling in the past years, with the aim of giving a comprehensive overview of the advantages and disadvantages of materials used in this field so as to help surgeons to make a better choice.

show abstract

Section: Biomaterialsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Materials to facilitate orbital reconstruction and soft tissue filling in posttraumatic orbital deformaties

Ye¹,

Sun²,

Zhang³

et al. 2016

PAR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The records of 50 consecutive patients from a private practice were reviewed; there were 34 women and 16 men, with an average age of 32.4 years (range 16 to 66 years). Among the 50 patients, CBGs were placed in 63 sites: the ramus (10), nasal dorsum (14), maxilla/alveolar ridge (12), glenoid fossa/temporal bone (14), mandibular body/symphysis (3), and orbitozygomatic complex (10). The longest follow-up averaged 22.4 months (range 12 to 48 months).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…CBGs have been utilized in reconstruction of the mandible (7), maxilla (8,9), orbital fl oor (10,11), orbital roof (12), malar region (13), and as a strut for nasal reconstruction (14). In craniofacial surgery, the CBG can be used to reconstruct advancement gaps resulting from Lefort I, II, and III procedures.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Application of Cranial Bone Grafts for Reconstruction of Maxillofacial Deformities

Movahed

Pinto²,

Morales-Ryan³

et al. 2013

Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…[42] There is still no consensus among the surgeons in the selection of the reconstruction material between autogenous and alloplastic grafts. Ilankovan [43] studied a case series of 222 patients and reported successful esthetic and functional outcomes by using calvarial bone graft. Shetty et al [44] compared the autogenous graft [calvarial bone graft] and alloplastic material (Prolene and titanium) in a case series including 10 patients, and found both materials appropriate for reconstruction, but noted the need for further studies with larger study populations.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical management and reconstruction of isolated orbital floor fractures: The role of computed tomography during preoperative evaluation

Baser¹,

Bulutoğlu²,

Celebi³

et al. 2011

Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AMAÇİzole orbita taban kırıklarının cerrahi endikasyonu, zamanlaması, kullanılacak rekonstrüksiyon materyali hakkında halen görüş birliği yoktur. GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM2002-2010 yılları arasında izole orbita taban kırığı tanısı alarak ameliyat edilen hastalar (41 erkek, 13 kadın) geriye dönük olarak değerlendirildi. BULGULARİzole orbita taban kırığı tanısı alan 54 hastadan, ameliyat edilen 49 hastanın cerrahi endikasyonuna bakıldığında, %20,4'ünde göz hareketlerinde kısıtlılık ve belirgin enoftalmi, %79,6'sında koronal planda çekilen bilgisayarlı tomografi görüntülerinin etkili olduğu görüldü. Hastaların %36,7'si ilk 16 saat içinde %10,2'si en geç 72-96 saat için-de ameliyat edildi. Orbita taban onarımı için ultra ince poröz polyetilen kullanıldı. Bu çalışma nedeniyle kendilerine ulaşılan 12 hastanın enoftalmi-egzoftalmi açısından normal sınırlarda olduğu, hiçbir hastada ektropiyon ya da skleral show bulgusu olmadığı, hastaların skara bağlı herhangi bir şikayetlerinin olmadığı görüldü. SONUÇTedavi edilmediğinde enoftalmi ve çift görme ile sonuç-lanabilecek olan orbita taban kırığında, iyi prognoz doğru cerrahi endikasyon, erken cerrahi girişim ve uygun materyal ile onarıma bağlı olduğunu düşünmekteyiz.Anahtar Sözcükler: Bilgisayarlı tomografi; orbita kırıkları; orbita implantları; X-ışınları.

show abstract

Experience in the use of calvarial bone grafts in orbital reconstruction

Cited by 109 publications

References 13 publications

Materials to facilitate orbital reconstruction and soft tissue filling in posttraumatic orbital deformaties

Materials to facilitate orbital reconstruction and soft tissue filling in posttraumatic orbital deformaties

Application of Cranial Bone Grafts for Reconstruction of Maxillofacial Deformities

Clinical management and reconstruction of isolated orbital floor fractures: The role of computed tomography during preoperative evaluation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About