2014
DOI: 10.1111/aji.12217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experience in IVIg Therapy for Selected Women with Recurrent Reproductive Failure and NK Cell Expansion

Abstract: Immunomodulation with IVIg in our selected group of RRF patients with immunologic alterations enhanced clinical pregnancy and live birth rates. Our results may facilitate the design of future clinical trials of IVIg in this pathology.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
60
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(53 reference statements)
3
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) seems to act through a multitude of mechanisms that include reducing the activity of NK cells, increasing the activity of suppressor T cells, elimination of immune complexes, down-regulation of stimulatory receptors, and upregulation of inhibitory receptors on the surface of different immune cells 85,86. Such as for VD, several studies have indicated that treatment with IVIG in RPL patients may improve pregnancy outcomes through an immunological effect [87][88][89]. However, this studies are underpowered for definitive conclusions and ESHRE Guidelines considered that IVIG cannot be recommended for clinical use at this moment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) seems to act through a multitude of mechanisms that include reducing the activity of NK cells, increasing the activity of suppressor T cells, elimination of immune complexes, down-regulation of stimulatory receptors, and upregulation of inhibitory receptors on the surface of different immune cells 85,86. Such as for VD, several studies have indicated that treatment with IVIG in RPL patients may improve pregnancy outcomes through an immunological effect [87][88][89]. However, this studies are underpowered for definitive conclusions and ESHRE Guidelines considered that IVIG cannot be recommended for clinical use at this moment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these results, IVIg was used in patients with RPLs or RIFs with these cellular immune abnormalities and many observational studies reported favorable pregnancy outcomes . The authors' previous study also demonstrated a significantly higher live birth rate using IVIg with women with unexplained RPLs and with cellular immune abnormalities (n = 49), as compared with that of IVIg non‐using women with unexplained RPLs and with cellular immune abnormalities (n = 39) who were reported in other studies (81.6% vs 30.8%) . The authors treated 189 patients with RPLs with or without IVIg, according to their etiologies: known conventional etiologies, thrombophilia, including APS, and cellular immune abnormalities, including the peripheral NK cell proportion and its cytotoxicity, and the Th1/Th2 ratio.…”
Section: Effect Of IV Immunoglobulin G Use In Reproductive Failurementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Subsequently, Winger et al [60] reported that IVIG significantly improved IVF success rates in subfertile women with increased Th1/Th2 ratios and/or NK cell levels as compared to those who did not undergo the treatment. Another observational study reported that IVIG treatment improved clinical pregnancy and live-birth rates in selected RPL and RIF patients with immunologic alterations [61]. …”
Section: The Validity Of Ivig Therapy For Each Indicationmentioning
confidence: 99%