2017
DOI: 10.1080/22054952.2017.1367362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experience, education and training on Aboriginal Cultural Heritage in engineering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They found that the best results were due to outsourcing community engagements, suggesting the need for more Indigenous awareness education for engineering students. Hollis and Goldfinch (2017) also surveyed Australian engineering graduates in their first years of the industry to assess their experience, training, and formal education of Indigenous Cultural Heritage. They found that some students took additional courses to learn about Indigenous Cultural Heritage, but it was not a requirement, therefore most graduates lacked the training and confidence to collaborate with Indigenous community stakeholders once in the industry (Hollis and Goldfinch 2017).…”
Section: Preparing Students For Professional Practice With Indigenous...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that the best results were due to outsourcing community engagements, suggesting the need for more Indigenous awareness education for engineering students. Hollis and Goldfinch (2017) also surveyed Australian engineering graduates in their first years of the industry to assess their experience, training, and formal education of Indigenous Cultural Heritage. They found that some students took additional courses to learn about Indigenous Cultural Heritage, but it was not a requirement, therefore most graduates lacked the training and confidence to collaborate with Indigenous community stakeholders once in the industry (Hollis and Goldfinch 2017).…”
Section: Preparing Students For Professional Practice With Indigenous...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key criticism related to the fact that developers had limited knowledge of Aboriginal cultural heritage and were poorly placed to identify the potential impacts their works may have on Aboriginal cultural heritage (DATSIP, 2017). For example, a recent study investigating the exposure of graduate engineers to Aboriginal cultural heritage training at university and in the work force found that 53% of participants employed in the public sector have been exposed to some form of Aboriginal cultural heritage training, whereas only 24% of participants in the private sector have been exposed to such training (Hollis & Goldfinch, 2017, p. 57). The ACHA relies heavily on the good conscience of developers and there have been consistent calls for traditional owners to be advised of and consulted in relation to all activities that will impact on Aboriginal cultural heritage (Brockett, 2013, p. 158; QSNTS, 2011, p. 15).…”
Section: How the Acha Operatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of State oversight means that it is unknown whether developers have the skills and expertise to recognise Aboriginal cultural heritage (Winn & Taçon, 2016, p. 180). A recent study on the cultural heritage capacities of graduate engineers concluded that a majority of engineers would not be confident in identifying an item or place of Aboriginal cultural heritage (Hollis & Goldfinch, 2017, p. 59).…”
Section: Private Governance: Key Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%