2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)81072-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experience-Dependent Asymmetric Shape of Hippocampal Receptive Fields

Abstract: We propose a novel parameter, namely, the skewness, or asymmetry, of the shape of a receptive field to characterize two properties of hippocampal place fields. First, a majority of hippocampal receptive fields on linear tracks are negatively skewed, such that during a single pass the firing rate is low as the rat enters the field but high as it exits. Second, while the place fields are symmetric at the beginning of a session, they become highly asymmetric with experience. Further experiments suggest that these… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

66
452
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 452 publications
(523 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
66
452
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We conjecture that repeated pairing of different streams of input could generate robust associations between them through rapid Hebbian synaptic plasticity, resulting in stable spatial representations 48 and increased firing rates 19,[48][49][50] . Under this model, during random foraging in RW, distal visual cues are paired repeatedly with the same constellation of proximal cues at each location, resulting in a place code.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We conjecture that repeated pairing of different streams of input could generate robust associations between them through rapid Hebbian synaptic plasticity, resulting in stable spatial representations 48 and increased firing rates 19,[48][49][50] . Under this model, during random foraging in RW, distal visual cues are paired repeatedly with the same constellation of proximal cues at each location, resulting in a place code.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the systematicpillar task, when we paired locomotion and visual cues repeatedly, this selectivity was strengthened and extended to the middle of the paths. Restricting the analysis to cells that fired on at least two nonoverlapping arms on the three-pillar task revealed that these cells exhibited a disto-code 21 , which is a specific case of the more general distance selectivity observed in the goal-directed tasks.We conjecture that repeated pairing of different streams of input could generate robust associations between them through rapid Hebbian synaptic plasticity, resulting in stable spatial representations 48 and increased firing rates 19,[48][49][50] . Under this model, during random foraging in RW, distal visual cues are paired repeatedly with the same constellation of proximal cues at each location, resulting in a place code.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Phase precession is not prevented by the NMDA receptor antagonist CPP, which blocks experience-dependent expression of long-term potentiation and, as a result, the asymmetric expansion of hippocampal place fields during repeated route following (Mehta, Quirk, & Wilson, 2000;Ekstrom et al, 2001). This finding is consistent with our model because plasticity at mf synapses is independent of NMDA receptors (Nicoll & Malenka, 1995;Nicoll & Schmitz, 2005).…”
Section: Perturbations Of the Hippocampusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the development of asymmetric place fields (Figure 1b), rate coding is sufficient [10,11,29,30] and a precise temporal code is not required. The development of asymmetric place fields [24,30] or, similarly, of visual receptive fields [31,32] could therefore be interpreted as a system-level signature of asymmetric Hebbian plasticity.…”
Section: Asymmetric Place Fields and Asymmetric Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mehta and colleagues found the shift from a symmetrical to asymmetrical place field during training, but they also found that this development of asymmetry was completely reset the following day [30]. Combining a symmetrical receptive field with an oscillatory inhibition would lead to a phase precession and then a recession, the result being that the spiking at a particular phase could not reliably represent the location.…”
Section: Open Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%