2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2016.02.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experience based reading of Pleistocene human footprints in Pech-Merle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study also confirms that very young children actively participated in the activities of the Upper Palaeolithic populations, even in seemingly dangerous tasks, such as the deep exploration of the cave environment lit only with torches. As recently suggested for other European caves (Pastoors et al, 2015; Pastoors et al, 2017; Ledoux et al, 2017) the ‘Grotta della Bàsura’ site strongly supports the hypothesis that the cave exploration in Upper Paleolithic was carried out by groups of heterogeneous age and gender.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Our study also confirms that very young children actively participated in the activities of the Upper Palaeolithic populations, even in seemingly dangerous tasks, such as the deep exploration of the cave environment lit only with torches. As recently suggested for other European caves (Pastoors et al, 2015; Pastoors et al, 2017; Ledoux et al, 2017) the ‘Grotta della Bàsura’ site strongly supports the hypothesis that the cave exploration in Upper Paleolithic was carried out by groups of heterogeneous age and gender.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Our study also confirms that very young children were active members during the activities of the Upper Palaeolithic populations, even in seemingly dangerous tasks, such as the deep exploration of the cave environment lit only with torches. As recently suggested for other European caves (Pastoors et al, 2015(Pastoors et al, , 2017Ledoux et al, 2017) the 'Grotta della Bàsura' site strongly supports the hypothesis that the cave exploration in Upper Paleolithic was carried out by heterogeneous groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Footprints have previously provided biological profile information on hominins from Laetoli, Tanzania (3 My BP; [15]); Ileret, Kenya (1.5 My BP; [16]); and Happisburgh, United Kingdom (1 My BP; [17]). More recent prehistoric human footprints were also studied in the cave of Pech-Merle, France [4]; in Willandra Lakes, Australia (13 to 23 ky BP; [18]); in Acahualinca, Nicaragua (4th millennium BCE; [19]); and in Jaguar Cave, Tennessee (3rd millennium BCE; [20]). However, the present work seems to be innovative in systematically estimating biological profile variables from footprints and shoeprints of Roman archaeological context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Handprints and footprints are examples of this. In the archaeological context, these marks can suggest the profile of individuals involved in prehistoric art, for example [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%