2020
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3887823
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experience and Lessons Learned from Pay-for-Performance (P4P) pilots for Energy Efficiency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If a business model considers combined effort opportunities between flexibility and energy savings in a real-time environment, the pay for performance (P4P) models should be considered. Such schemes imply the existence of smart (interval) meters, which register the energy consumption which is therefore normalized and associated with weather conditions [13]. Additionally, with such scheme the uncertainties that a specific measure will lead to savings are minimized, while methods applied for monitoring and verification of energy savings should grant continuous calibration of the calculated savings, therefore minimize errors in assessments.…”
Section: Monitoring Energy Efficiency Measures In a Dynamic Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a business model considers combined effort opportunities between flexibility and energy savings in a real-time environment, the pay for performance (P4P) models should be considered. Such schemes imply the existence of smart (interval) meters, which register the energy consumption which is therefore normalized and associated with weather conditions [13]. Additionally, with such scheme the uncertainties that a specific measure will lead to savings are minimized, while methods applied for monitoring and verification of energy savings should grant continuous calibration of the calculated savings, therefore minimize errors in assessments.…”
Section: Monitoring Energy Efficiency Measures In a Dynamic Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%