Experience and lessons from health impact assessment guiding prevention and control of HIV/AIDS in a copper mine project, northwestern Zambia

Abstract

BackgroundTo avoid or mitigate potential project-related adverse health effects, the Trident copper project in Kalumbila, northwestern Zambia, commissioned a health impact assessment. HIV was identified a priority health issue based on the local vulnerability to HIV transmission and experience from other mining projects in Africa. Hence, an HIV/AIDS management plan was developed, including community and workplace interventions, with HIV testing and counselling (HTC) being one of the key components. We present trends in HTC data over a 4-year period.MethodsIn 13 communities affected by the Trident project, HTC was implemented from 2012 onwards, using rapid diagnostic tests, accompanied by pre- and post-test counselling through trained personnel. In addition, HTC was initiated in the project workforce in 2013, coinciding with the launch of the mine development. HTC uptake and HIV positivity rates were assessed in the study population and linked to demographic factors using regression analysis.ResultsIn total, 11,638 community members and 5564 workers have taken up HTC with an increase over time. The HIV positivity rate in the community was 3.0% in 2012 and 3.4% in 2015, while positivity rate in the workforce was 5.2% in 2013 and 4.3% in 2015. Females showed a significantly higher odds of having a positive test result than males (odds ratio (OR) = 1.96, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.55–2.50 among women in the community and OR = 2.90, 95% CI: 1.74–4.84 among women in the workforce). HTC users in the 35–49 years age group were most affected by HIV, with an average positivity rate of 6.6% in the community sample and 7.9% in the workforce sample. These study groups had 4.50 and 4.95 higher odds of being positive, respectively, compared to their younger counterparts (15–24 years).ConclusionsWhile HTC uptake increased five-fold in the community and almost three-fold in the workplace, the HIV positivity rates were insignificantly higher in 2015 compared to 2012. Our data can be used alongside other surveillance data to track HIV transmission in this specific context. Guided by the health impact assessment, the HIV prevention and control programme was readily adapted to the current setting through the identification of socioeconomic and environmental determinants of health.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40249-017-0320-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Monitoring of Selected Health Indicators in Children Living in a Copper Mine Development Area in Northwestern Zambia

“…Supported by this evidence-base, the HIA identified a wide range of health conditions that warranted management and monitoring throughout the project lifecycle. A priority was given to the control of STIs, including HIV, based on the perceived significant impact, whereas the outcomes of mitigation activities are publicly shared elsewhere [52]. In the absence of a regulation that requires transparent dissemination of HIA outcomes, presenting the findings in the peer-reviewed literature provides an opportunity to adhere to good practice standards such as transparency and the ethical use of evidence, while at the same time producing valuable case studies of HIA practice in the context of natural resource development projects in low- and middle-income countries [53,54]…”

Differences and similarities of high-resolution computed tomography features between Pneumocystis pneumonia and Cytomegalovirus pneumonia in AIDS patients

“…AIDS remains one of the most widespread infectious diseases and a major global health concern in resource-poor settings [1][2] . According to UNAIDS, an estimated 1.7 million people [1.2 million-2.2 million] acquired HIV worldwide in 2019, still three times higher than 500 000 milestone set for 2020 [3] .…”

Health impact assessment for promoting sustainable development: the HIA4SD project

“…Secondly, the creation of employment and income can reduce poverty (SDG1) and malnutrition rates (SDG2) on one hand, and improve health insurance coverage (SDG3) on the other hand (Bradley et al 2013;Langston et al 2015;Knoblauch et al 2017a). Thirdly, public-private partnerships can synergise efforts for disease control and elimination programmes (SDG3) (Asante et al 2011;Drewry et al 2017;Knoblauch et al 2017b;Saric et al 2019). Finally, tax revenues and royalties from private sector companies are essential for national and local governments to work towards all SDGs (Otto et al 2006).…”

“…The various potential positive effects of natural resource extraction projects are opposed by potential risks to public health due to their operations. Projectinduced in-migration puts strains on local health systems (SDG3, SDG10 and SDG11), water and sanitation infrastructure (SDG6) and food security (SDG2) (Westwood and Orenstein 2016;Knoblauch et al 2018). Environmental degradation, in combination with changing ecosystems, might alter patterns of vector-related diseases (Knoblauch et al 2014b;Diakite et al 2017) and exposure to hazardous emissions (SDG3) (Krieger et al 2012;Ncube et al 2012).…”