2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0310.2001.00700.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experience Affects Female Responses to Male Song in the Variable Field Cricket Gryllus lineaticeps (Orthoptera, Gryllidae)

Abstract: Search theory predicts that females will use information on search costs and the characteristics of potential mates to adjust their search behavior and mate choices. We examined the effect of previous acoustic experience on female mating responses in the variable field cricket Gryllus lineaticeps. Females of this species prefer calling songs with higher chirp rates to those with lower chirp rates. In this study we examined how female responses to male calling songs change with experience by measuring the respo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
70
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We minimized any habituation effects by performing phonotaxis trials just after the onset of sexual receptivity (Sakaluk 1982). Finally, the effects of recent exposure to song, 'prior male' effects, have been documented in other cricket species, and can influence subsequent mating decisions at least 20 min after exposure ( Wagner et al 2001). We therefore removed females from the Song environment and kept them acoustically isolated for a single light cycle; all crickets experienced a minimum of 16 hours of undisturbed silence prior to testing.…”
Section: Materials and Methods (A) Study Organismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We minimized any habituation effects by performing phonotaxis trials just after the onset of sexual receptivity (Sakaluk 1982). Finally, the effects of recent exposure to song, 'prior male' effects, have been documented in other cricket species, and can influence subsequent mating decisions at least 20 min after exposure ( Wagner et al 2001). We therefore removed females from the Song environment and kept them acoustically isolated for a single light cycle; all crickets experienced a minimum of 16 hours of undisturbed silence prior to testing.…”
Section: Materials and Methods (A) Study Organismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Females were tested only once. The cross-sectional design mitigated the known effects of immediate prior acoustic experience on female phonotaxis behaviour that would have confounded our measures of responsiveness if we repeatedly tested each individual ( Wagner et al 2001).…”
Section: (D) Phonotaxis Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results suggest that hormones affect the intercept, but probably not the slope of the UF. Plasticity in mating decisions has been found to be related not only to female reproductive stage, but also to female condition (Burley and Foster, 2006;Eraly et al, 2009;Fisher and Rosenthal, 2006;Fawcett and Johnstone, 2003a;Moskalik and Uetz, 2011;Poulin, 1994;Slagsvold et al, 1988), to age (Bateman et al, 2001;Kodric-Brown and Nicoletto, 2001;Moore and Moore, 2001), and to ecological (Booksmythe et al, 2008;Chaine and Lyon, 2008;Forsgren, 1992;Godin and Briggs, 1996;Gong and Gibson, 1996;Milner et al, 2010) and social conditions (Bailey andZuk, 2008, 2009;Collins, 1995;Hebets, 2003;Izzo and Gray, 2011;Lehmann, 2007;Rebar et al, 2011;Wagner et al, 2001). In particular, strong evidence for an effect of social experience on mating preferences has been provided by studies on the cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus.…”
Section: The Perceived Utility Of Prospective Mates: U = P(a|h)/p(a|hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Castellano et al / Behavioural Processes xxx (2012) xxx-xxx As mentioned above, however, variation in female choosiness may be due to a variation in the decision rule (DR) rather than in the decision variable (DV). Indeed, this pattern has been usually explained as evidence for a flexible threshold in decision rules (Wagner et al, 2001). Since the two hypotheses are not necessarily alternative to each other, it may not be easy to devise an empirical experiment able to contrast them.…”
Section: The Perceived Utility Of Prospective Mates: U = P(a|h)/p(a|hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…data). Presenting all females with the same average song in the first test ensured we would have the opportunity to detect differential responses to the test songs and that all females had exactly the same adult experience with song (experience with different song types is known to affect female responses in this species; Wagner et al 2001b). Second, the initial test provided a measure of female responsiveness to song that could be used to control for differences in female responsiveness in the preference test.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%