2017
DOI: 10.14379/iodp.proc.356.102.2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expedition 356 methods

Abstract: Introduction 4 Lithostratigraphy and sedimentology 12 Biostratigraphy and micropaleontology 19 Geochemistry 21 Paleomagnetism 23 Physical properties 28 Downhole measurements 31 Stratigraphic correlation 34 References

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
71
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(93 reference statements)
0
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the HNGS response is influenced by the borehole diameter, data are corrected for borehole diameter variations. In the upper ~80 m, the HNGS measures NGR through the drill pipe, causing an attenuated signal [ Gallagher et al , ]. Although relative variations in this interval are meaningful, we do not interpret this portion of the record.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As the HNGS response is influenced by the borehole diameter, data are corrected for borehole diameter variations. In the upper ~80 m, the HNGS measures NGR through the drill pipe, causing an attenuated signal [ Gallagher et al , ]. Although relative variations in this interval are meaningful, we do not interpret this portion of the record.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Sediment recovery at Site U1463 (18°58′S, 117°37′E; 145 m water depth) was 80% [ Gallagher et al , ], permitting an excellent correlation between the lithology and the downhole wireline logs (Figure S2). Logging data do not include the upper 72 m because the drill pipe was positioned at that depth.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Black dots (left) = locations of smear slide samples. See Figure F7 in the Expedition 356 methods chapter (Gallagher et al, 2017a) for lithology key. from coarse silt to sand are also common ( Figures F5, F6).…”
Section: Smear Slidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermal conductivity was also measured in several sections and varied between 1.0 and 1.3 W/(m·K). Bulk density was determined using both GRA and MAD methods (see Physical properties in the Expedition 356 methods chapter [Gallagher et al, 2017a]). These two methods yielded consistent increases in density with depth to 160 m CSF-A, below which it becomes variable.…”
Section: Physical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%