“…When designing future studies researchers should consider ways to: define as well as quantify violence, intentionality, threats of violence, verbal abuse, and bullying (bullying should be included based on the WHO's finding that verbal abuse and bullying results in emotional injury leading to trauma to the worker and a negative effect on the performance and efficiency of the organization); examine differences among personnel such as sex, age, EMTs versus paramedics, and firefighter versus non‐firefighter because differences found between different demographic types and job titles may contribute to an improved understanding of risk factors; examine and recommend uniform case definitions as well as standardized and reliable reporting policies, procedures and practices; determine the economic cost of violence against EMS personnel and the cost/benefit of risk reduction strategies; capture near‐miss cases because near‐miss incident data can be useful in incident prevention; consider utilizing a mixed‐methods approach when investigating the problem; develop a consensus on incident reporting collection including methods to identify the perpetrators (eg, patient, patient family member, person known to victim, coworker) and outcomes to the staff (eg, amount of lost work time, need for medical care, long‐term disability, career termination); design and evaluate interventions to reduce the risk of violent incidents because reducing the risk of assaults has the potential to save lives, prevent injuries, reduce agency costs, reduce personnel turnover, improve morale, and may ultimately improve the delivery and quality of ambulance services; implement ongoing monitoring to determine if the intervention solved the problem and to ensure widespread adoption; and determine if the intervention created unintended consequences such as an increase in heat emergencies among EMS personnel after deploying bullet‐proof vests.…”