2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.119.028301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expected Number of Fixed Points in Boolean Networks with Arbitrary Topology

Abstract: Boolean network models describe genetic, neural, and social dynamics in complex networks, where the dynamics depend generally on network topology. Fixed points in a genetic regulatory network are typically considered to correspond to cell types in an organism. We prove that the expected number of fixed points in a Boolean network, with Boolean functions drawn from probability distributions that are not required to be uniform or identical, is one, and is independent of network topology if only a feedback arc se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, another fixed point emerges at s = −s * corresponding to a drive of −1 in the open loop system. Since the aforementioned condition is met with probability half we have an expected number of 2 × 1 2 = 1 fixed points in agreement with [38].…”
Section: Appendix B: Quasi Fixed Pointsmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, another fixed point emerges at s = −s * corresponding to a drive of −1 in the open loop system. Since the aforementioned condition is met with probability half we have an expected number of 2 × 1 2 = 1 fixed points in agreement with [38].…”
Section: Appendix B: Quasi Fixed Pointsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Appendix C: Fixed points are always there, regardless of topology Defined by equation (1), our system turns out to be a special case of the Theorem in Ref. [38] which states that the expectation EM of number of fixed points M in random Boolean networks is one, subject to a condition on the distribution of random Boolean functions that holds in our setting. Specifically, to comply with [38] an ensemble of random Boolean functions φ i (s) defining the network dynamics via s i (t+1) = φ i (s(t)), must have a set of neutral links, removal of which renders the network acyclic.…”
Section: Appendix B: Quasi Fixed Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This meaning is important in the sense that it establishes a connection between regulation graphs (or R-graphs) and state graphs. We take the meaning proposed by Naldi et al ( 2007 ) (and used also by Richard et al, 2012 and Mori and Mochizuki, 2017 ). According to this definition, a regulation is functional if it is sufficient to modify the activity of the regulated variable in a non-empty set of (molecular) contexts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because in Griffin the regulation graph plays a prominent role, the definition of a regulation is fundamental. Griffin uses the definition of Naldi et al ( 2007 ), Richard et al ( 2012 ), and Mori and Mochizuki ( 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However finding all attractors (including cyclic and complex attractors) is challenging due to the complex dynamics of networks [12]. Thanks to the strong advances in understanding network structure [13][14][15][16], a promising way to tackle this problem is to try to find the attractors based on the network topology and the key features of the network's dynamics, instead of from its detailed dynamics [17]. For example, R. Thomas related the conditions of multi-stability and cyclic attractors to positive and negative feedback loops, respectively [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%