2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2017.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expected drag minimization for aerodynamic design optimization based on aircraft operational data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative permittivity is carried out by the substrate of the patch and the thickness of the patch can be represented as t. The frequency range of patch antenna design is 1GHz. The power radiated and received from the antenna is depends on the radial distance and angular position [26][27][28][29][30]. The patch antenna length can be evaluated by [31][32][33],…”
Section: Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative permittivity is carried out by the substrate of the patch and the thickness of the patch can be represented as t. The frequency range of patch antenna design is 1GHz. The power radiated and received from the antenna is depends on the radial distance and angular position [26][27][28][29][30]. The patch antenna length can be evaluated by [31][32][33],…”
Section: Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first is that to apply it successfully requires careful selection of both the design points (these are often known a priori but can be determined using gradient span analysis [27]), and the weightings between the objectives at those design points. This issue can be eased by using automated weight selections [28,29], an integral approach [30] or a probabilistic approach [31]. The second common issue is the cost surrounding multi-point optimization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such problems arise broadly in chemical process design, structural design, renewable energy systems, portfolio optimization, stochastic model predictive control, discrete event systems, and many other applications. Moreover, although we restrict our attention to single‐stage problems in this article (i.e., problems with no recourse decisions), more flexible two‐stage and multistage formulations can also be reduced to Problem (1) through the use of parameterized decision rules, which is an increasingly popular method for obtaining tractable approximate solutions …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the applications above, many uncertainties are best modeled by continuous random variables, including process yields, material properties, renewable power generation, product demands, returns on investments, and so forth . However, when f is nonlinear with respect to bold-italicω, this very often precludes writing the function F(x)E[f(x,ω)] analytically in closed form.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%