2012
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2012-0897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expected Body Weight in Adolescents: Comparison Between Weight-for-Stature and BMI Methods

Abstract: The WFS and BMI methods are not equivalent in determining EBW in adolescents and are not interchangeable. EBW(WFS) was ~3.5% higher than EBW(BMI). In adolescents with eating disorders, use of the BMI method will underestimate the degree of malnutrition compared with the WFS method. Which method better predicts meaningful clinical outcomes remains to be determined.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…91 In addition, BMI values in adolescents with eating disorders (or underweight adolescents) can result in an underestimation of the degree of malnutrition. 92 Although there are normative data for body fat percentage, there are no established recommendations regarding body composition in children and adolescents. 93 Body fat percentage varies by age.…”
Section: Weight Bmi and Body Composition Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…91 In addition, BMI values in adolescents with eating disorders (or underweight adolescents) can result in an underestimation of the degree of malnutrition. 92 Although there are normative data for body fat percentage, there are no established recommendations regarding body composition in children and adolescents. 93 Body fat percentage varies by age.…”
Section: Weight Bmi and Body Composition Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, those below the cut-offs differed for BMD Z scores across all sites from controls and AN above the cutoffs. Of note, weight-for-stature and BMI methods for determining EBW yield distinct results, with EBW based on BMI being consistently lower and possibly underestimating the degree of malnutrition, particularly in very tall girls (Golden, Yang, Jacobson, et al, 2012). This may reduce the capability of cut-offs based on %mBMI to pick up medical morbidity associated with AN, and that %EBW-Ht may better estimate nutritional status in tall girls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another limitation is that direct height-weight data were not available at all statures, so age-based data were used to synthesize weight-from-height over these ranges. The age-mapping applied is equivalent to that of the McLaren method, which has 2 main limitations identified [23, 37, 38]: (1) it does not recognize age-related variation, of importance to nutrition assessment but less relevant to lean body weight estimation, and (2) it cannot offer prediction above the tallest median height, which is resolved in the MBW model by linear extrapolation at taller heights. The notion of mapping 50 th centile height to 50 th centile weight is broadly accepted, in contrast to doing so further from the median (as inherent to the Moore estimation method) [37, 38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%