Expectations of treatment and satisfaction with dentofacial appearance in orthodontic patients

Bos, Annemieke; Hoogstraten, J.; Prahl-Andersen, Birte

doi:10.1067/mod.2003.84

Cited by 128 publications

(134 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

117

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition, the finding that the presence of a preoccupa tion with one's physical appearance was a significant predictor of the intention to initiate orthodontic treatment is consist ent with research showing that dissatis faction regarding one's appearance is one of the most important motivating factors for undergoing orthodontic treatment. 21 Thirdly, assessment of psychiatric symp toms such as BDD characteristics relies heavily on the likelihood of participants' agreement to participate and to report on these matters. For example, it is likely that the report on BDD characteristics may have been impaired by shame and embarrassment to disclose the severity of individuals' preoccupation, which in turn may have led to underreporting, and therefore to an underestimation of the prevalence of symptoms of BDD.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Preoccupation with one's appearance: a motivating factor for cosmetic dental treatment?

et al. 2008

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Preoccupation with one's appearance: a motivating factor for cosmetic dental treatment?

et al. 2008

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…13,16 Moreover, the consciousness regarding self-image might be more prominent during adolescence. 15 Therefore, most of these patients might have had an appropriate self-evaluation method.…”

Section: Age and Gendermentioning

confidence: 99%

“…13 Self-perception of body image may change with age. 14,15 Some studies suggest that young adults may have higher expectations than children, 4,11,[15][16][17][18] whereas others have found a lower willingness toward treatment in young adults. 14,16 There are also indications that younger participants might have appropriate self-concepts similar to those of older participants.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Associations between normative and self-perceived orthodontic treatment needs in young-adult dental patients

et al. 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Our aim was to determine the correlation between dental treatment need as assessed by the components of the index of orthodontic treatment need (IOTN) and a self-evaluation questionnaire in a population selected from the dental clinics of Shiraz, Iran. Methods: The dental treatment needs of 240 participants (120 men and 120 women) were measured on the basis of the IOTN dental health component (IOTN-DHC), IOTN aesthetic component (IOTN-AC), IOTN AC determined by the examiner (IOTN-ACE), and a self-evaluation questionnaire (SEQ). The correlations between the treatment needs assessed by all the methods as well as the correlations of the treatment needs with age and gender were assessed using a Spearman's correlation coefficient (α = 0.01). Results: All methods were significantly correlated (p ≤ 0.001). The associations of IOTN-ACE with IOTN-DHC and SEQ were moderately significant (rho = 0.49 and 0.41, respectively). The associations of IOTN-AC with IOTN-DHC and SEQ were weakly significant (rho = 0.24 and 0.35, respectively). The IOTN-DHC was moderately associated with SEQ (rho = 0.53). Gender and age were not associated with treatment needs estimated by any of the methods used (p ＞ 0.06). Conclusions: The correlations between the self-evaluation and the IOTN components in young adults were close to those reported in children, and IOTN-ACE was more reliable than IOTN-AC. (Korean J Orthod 2011;41(6):440-446)

show abstract

“…Bos et al (27) used a questionnaire designed for patients undergoing orthognathic surgery and modified it in order to be used for orthodontic patients. Several modifications to OHRQoL questionnaires for orthodontic patients have been described.…”

Section: Comparison With Other Questionnairesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Three questionnaires to assess the perception of fixed orthodontic therapy before, during and after treatment: validity and reliability

Yassir

McIntyre

Bearn

2016

EORTHO

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SummaryBackground/objective: To assess the validity and reliability of a series of three questionnaires for the quantification of patient perception of fixed appliance orthodontic treatment. Subjects and methods:The study was carried out at the University of Dundee with content and face validity being assessed using proformas. Initially ten experts (Orthodontic Specialists) assessed content validity with 11 professionals (seven Orthodontic Specialists and four Postgraduates) and 20 patients assessing face validity. Content validity was determined according to the values of item-level content validity index (I-CVI) and scale-level CVI (S-CVI/Ave), while specially designed feedback forms were used for face validation. Internal consistency determined the reliability of the questionnaires according to the value of Cronbach alpha correlation coefficient test. The three questionnaires were then modified according to the recommendations of professionals and patients with seven experts reassessing content validity and ten newly selected patients assessing face validity. Results: The first round of content validity revealed that around half of the items in the questionnaires were not valid. Therefore, the questionnaires were not valid as a whole (S-CVI/Ave = 0.60). After modifying the questionnaires and removing the non-valid items, the new versions of the Pretreatment, Orthodontic Experience, and Post-treatment Questionnaires showed high levels of face validity, content validity (S-CVI/Ave: 0.99, 0.97, and 0.99, respectively) and good levels of internal consistency (α = 0.86, 0.78, and 0.88, respectively). Limitation: The patient sample was collected from a single university clinic and from one city within the UK and this could affect the generalizability of the results. Conclusion: Three content valid and reliable questionnaires have been developed and validated for the evaluation of patient perception of fixed appliance orthodontic treatment. Implications: Unlike other tools that assess oral health quality of life, this series of three questionnaires assess the perception of fixed appliance orthodontic treatment before, during and after treatment.

show abstract

Expectations of treatment and satisfaction with dentofacial appearance in orthodontic patients

Cited by 128 publications

References 18 publications

Preoccupation with one's appearance: a motivating factor for cosmetic dental treatment?

Preoccupation with one's appearance: a motivating factor for cosmetic dental treatment?

Associations between normative and self-perceived orthodontic treatment needs in young-adult dental patients

Three questionnaires to assess the perception of fixed orthodontic therapy before, during and after treatment: validity and reliability

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About