Expectations induced by natural-like temporal fluctuations are independent of attention decrement: Evidence from behavior and early visual evoked potentials

Derosière, Gérard; Farrugia, Nicolas; Perrey, Stéphane; Ward, Tomás E.; Torre, Kjerstin

doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.09.015

Cited by 9 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 57 publications

(95 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This may reflect the increased attention required in the more demanding active task. This main effect may relate to the suggestion that attention and temporal expectancy are independent mechanisms (Derosiere et al, 2015;Summerfield and Egner, 2009). Interestingly, there was no such task difference when the same analysis was applied to the standard tone at the start of the trial.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 91%

Temporal expectancies driven by self- and externally generated rhythms

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The dynamic attending theory proposes that rhythms entrain periodic fluctuations of attention which modulate the gain of sensory input. However, temporal expectancies can also be driven by the mere passage of time (foreperiod effect). It is currently unknown how these two types of temporal expectancy relate to each other, i.e. whether they work in parallel and have distinguishable neural signatures. The current research addresses this issue. Participants either tapped a 1Hz rhythm (active task) or were passively presented with the same rhythm using tactile stimulators (passive task). Based on this rhythm an auditory target was then presented early, in synchrony, or late. Behavioural results were in line with the dynamic attending theory as RTs were faster for in- compared to out-of-synchrony targets. Electrophysiological results suggested self-generated and externally induced rhythms to entrain neural oscillations in the delta frequency band. Auditory ERPs showed evidence of two distinct temporal expectancy processes. Both tasks demonstrated a pattern which followed a linear foreperiod effect. In the active task, however, we also observed an ERP effect consistent with the dynamic attending theory. This study shows that temporal expectancies generated by a rhythm and expectancy generated by the mere passage of time can work in parallel and sheds light on how these mechanisms are implemented in the brain.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 91%

Temporal expectancies driven by self- and externally generated rhythms

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The duration of the cross presentation varies from 0.75 to 1.25 seconds. The ''floating'' time of stimulus presentation is used to prevent the student from getting used to the task's timings [56]. Then the target number, which the participant needs to remember, is displayed on the screen for 1.5-2.0 seconds.…”

Section: A Visual Search Assessment Testmentioning

confidence: 99%

Open-Loop Neuroadaptive System for Enhancing Student’s Cognitive Abilities in Learning

Grubov,

Khramova,

Goman

et al. 2024

IEEE Access

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Neuroeducation seeks to implement knowledge about neural mechanisms of learning into educational practice and to understand the impact of learning itself. The crucial tasks in this field are to evaluate and to enhance cognitive abilities, that are used in monitoring educational performance, but also known to greatly impact learning process. Contemporary neuroscience achieved significant progress in measuring brain cognitive abilities through mental state assessment. Popular approach to this task based on brain-computer interface can be difficult to implement in the context of education, but general concept of neuroadaptation is still plausible. In this study, we propose open-loop neuroadaptive system for enhancing student's cognitive abilities in learning. Assessment of cognitive abilities is based on the concept of executive functions. We design EEG study with special tests and use combined analysis of behavioral and brain activity to assess the level of development of cognitive abilities. Feedback in this system is implemented in the form of recommendations aimed to develop and enhance underdeveloped cognitive abilities and skills. Recommendations have form of various types of extracurricular activities and are based on extensive literature search. This is the system with open-loop adaptation, as it can assess cognitive abilities, provide feedback aimed to enhance these abilities and then after a period of time it can assess cognitive abilities again as a part of the next loop. We believe that developed neuroadaptive system has a potential to be used in educational institutes.

show abstract

“…The study included 3 sessions, conducted on separate days at a 24-hour interval. Testing always occurred at the same time of the day for a given subject, to avoid variations that could be due to changes in chronobiologic states (Derosiere et al, 2015a;Schmidt et al, 2006). Each session comprised 4 blocks of 50 trials, with each block lasting about 5.5 minutes.…”

Section: Blocks and Sessionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

M1 disruption delays motor processes but not deliberation about action choices

Derosière

Thura

Cisek

et al. 2018

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Decisions about actions typically involve a period of deliberation that ends with the commitment to a choice and the motor processes overtly expressing that choice. Previous studies have shown that neural activity in sensorimotor areas, including the primary motor cortex (M1), correlates with deliberation features during action selection. Yet, the causal contribution of these areas to the decision process remains unclear. Here, we investigated whether M1 determines choice commitment, or whether it simply reflects decision signals coming from upstream structures and instead mainly contributes to the motor processes that follow commitment. To do so, we tested the impact of a disruption of M1 activity, induced by continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS), on the behavior of human subjects in (1) a simple reaction time (SRT) task allowing us to estimate the duration of the motor processes and (2) a modified version of the tokens task (Cisek et al., 2009), which allowed us to estimate subjects' time of commitment as well as accuracy criterion. The efficiency of cTBS was attested by a reduction in motor evoked potential amplitudes following M1 disruption, as compared to those following a sham stimulation. Furthermore, M1 cTBS lengthened SRTs, indicating that motor processes were perturbed by the intervention. Importantly, all of the behavioral results in the tokens task were similar following M1 disruption and sham stimulation, suggesting that the contribution of M1 to the deliberation process is negligible. Taken together, these findings indicate that M1 contribution is downstream of the decision process. New and noteworthyDecisions between actions are ubiquitous in the animal realm. Deliberation during action choices entails changes in the activity of the sensorimotor areas controlling those actions, but the causal role of these areas is still often debated. Using continuous theta burst stimulation, we show that disrupting the primary motor cortex (M1) delays the motor processes that follow instructed commitment but does not alter volitional deliberation, suggesting that M1 contribution is downstream of the decision process.

show abstract

Expectations induced by natural-like temporal fluctuations are independent of attention decrement: Evidence from behavior and early visual evoked potentials

Cited by 9 publications

References 57 publications

Temporal expectancies driven by self- and externally generated rhythms

Temporal expectancies driven by self- and externally generated rhythms

Open-Loop Neuroadaptive System for Enhancing Student’s Cognitive Abilities in Learning

M1 disruption delays motor processes but not deliberation about action choices

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About