2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2005.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expectations for renewable energy under market restructuring: the U.S. experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, deregulation is not a significant enough factor to substantially alter the balance of states' generation assets, as is also supported by Cory and Swezey (2007). One possible explanation for this finding is that deregulation does not discourage the continued use of coal generation from amortized power plants (Dahl & Ko, 1998; Hyman, 2006); a transition away from a heavy reliance on coal generation therefore will require more policy intervention than deregulation of a state's electricity market (Hyman, 2006). However, the literature could benefit from additional studies that evaluate empirically the relationship between regulation status and other policy interventions, and between combined policy efforts and electricity market outcomes.…”
Section: Trends In the Era Of State Energy Policy Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, deregulation is not a significant enough factor to substantially alter the balance of states' generation assets, as is also supported by Cory and Swezey (2007). One possible explanation for this finding is that deregulation does not discourage the continued use of coal generation from amortized power plants (Dahl & Ko, 1998; Hyman, 2006); a transition away from a heavy reliance on coal generation therefore will require more policy intervention than deregulation of a state's electricity market (Hyman, 2006). However, the literature could benefit from additional studies that evaluate empirically the relationship between regulation status and other policy interventions, and between combined policy efforts and electricity market outcomes.…”
Section: Trends In the Era Of State Energy Policy Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some other studies have also provided their contribution in the field of smart technology and customer experience (Berman, 2012;Blázquez, 2014;Cook, 2014;Fitzgerald et al, 2014;Jayaram et al, 2015;Marinova et al, 2017;Moreno-Munoz et al, 2016;Roy et al, 2017;Verhoef et al, 2017;Altıntaş and Yacouba, 2017). In addition, REC is empirically examined under the situation of reconstruction of US market and customer's expectations (Heiman, 2006). On the other hand, (Wiser, 1998) expressed his opinion for the green power marketing for consumer demand and renewable energy.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the correlation with load factor, the unit investment cost is now measured in euro/megawatt hours and is site specific. The lower the wind speed, the higher the cost 10 .…”
Section: Investment Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 We assume that electricity prices follow first-order Markov processes and their conditional expectations are given by: Et(es) = et. 10 The local wind climate is the most important factor in determining wind investment cost. For example, it is estimated that the cost of wind electricity ranges from approximately 7-10 euro cents/kWh at sites with low average wind speeds to approximately 5-6.5 euro cents/kWh at a wind site with average speeds (EWEA, 2012).…”
Section: Investment Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation