1974
DOI: 10.2307/3002783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expectations and Reality: A Case Study of Return Migration from the United States to Southern Italy

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org..

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
8

Year Published

1984
1984
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
24
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the structural approach does not perceive return as the mere individual experience of the migrant, but argues that return migration should also be analyzed with reference to the social and institutional context in the country of origin (Cassorino, 2004;Cerase 1974;King, 1986). Within this approach, the work of Cerase (1974) provides one of the most cited typologies of return migration, distinguishing between four kinds of return of first generation immigrants, namely return because of failure, conservatism, retirement, and innovation.…”
Section: Structural Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the structural approach does not perceive return as the mere individual experience of the migrant, but argues that return migration should also be analyzed with reference to the social and institutional context in the country of origin (Cassorino, 2004;Cerase 1974;King, 1986). Within this approach, the work of Cerase (1974) provides one of the most cited typologies of return migration, distinguishing between four kinds of return of first generation immigrants, namely return because of failure, conservatism, retirement, and innovation.…”
Section: Structural Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, due to their time abroad, return migrants missed social relations to local and regional actors necessary for establishing a new enterprise. And linked to that, thirdly, innovative return migrants were not supported or even blocked by powerful regional actors (Cerase, 1974;King et al, 1986). Following this line of thought, King et al (1986) identified the need for an institutional framework in the receiving regions that enables return migrants "to fully mobilize these inputs for the optimum benefit of the local and regional economy" (King et al, 1986, p. 65).…”
Section: Review Of Earlier Studies and Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of 'return preparedness', proposed by Jean-Pierre Cassarino (2004), builds on earlier 'structuralist' accounts of return migration which contended that for return to be sustainable, migrants must readapt to social norms and economic and political © 2015 The Author(s) structures in the place to which they return (Cerase 1974;Gmelch 1980). 9 These factors can be summarized as 'vested interests and traditional ways of thinking' (Cerase 1974: 258).…”
Section: Ict and Return Preparedness: Mobilizing Influence And Managimentioning
confidence: 99%