2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmacro.2017.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expectations and forecasting during the Great Depression: Real-time evidence from the business press

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our next step, then, is to use forecasts generated by using a textual analysis of real-time qualitative statements about economic activity. These correspond to quantitative forecasts of business activity (Mathy and Stekler, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our next step, then, is to use forecasts generated by using a textual analysis of real-time qualitative statements about economic activity. These correspond to quantitative forecasts of business activity (Mathy and Stekler, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…10 The qualitative forecasts came from The New York Times (NYT) and the Commercial and Financial Chronicle (CFC). 11 The method was developed by Goldfarb et al (2005), who only examined the 1929-30 forecasts, and used by Mathy and Stekler (2017) to evaluate the real-time nowcasts and forecasts for the entire recessionary phase of the Depression.…”
Section: Qualitative Business Forecasts Of Economic Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…12 An appealing extension in this context is motivated by the results put forward in Mathy and Stekler (2017). They show that business analysts were highly able to comprehend the situation along the quarters surrounding the global financial crisis: They use qualitative statements published in the financial press and convert them into quantitative information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intention was to obtain an assessment of the title without any explicit data on the year of the corresponding information flow. In the spirit of the methodology used by Mathy and Stekler (), a volunteer was then asked to read and rate the tone of each title. Three ratings were considered: −1 (negative), 0 (neutral), and 1 (positive).…”
Section: Additional Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%