2014
DOI: 10.1080/1068316x.2013.876500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expectations about victim and offender behaviour during stranger rape

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
16
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike previous research (Dinos, Burrowes, Hammond, & Cunliffe, 2015;Sleath & Woodhams, 2014), except for weak correlations with AMMSA (Gerger et al, 2007) and…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unlike previous research (Dinos, Burrowes, Hammond, & Cunliffe, 2015;Sleath & Woodhams, 2014), except for weak correlations with AMMSA (Gerger et al, 2007) and…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…Aggression Scale (AMMSA) (Gerger, Kley, Bohner & Siebler, 2007) to measure their rape myth beliefs, the Homosexuality Attitude Scale (HAS) (Kite & Deaux, 1986) to measure whether levels of homophobia impacted judgements differently by complainant gender, and the Just World Scale (Dalbert, Montada & Schmitt, 1987) to measure the belief that in a just world people tend to get the outcome they deserve. This opinion is linked to increased victim blaming and assuming rape only happens to certain societal groups (e.g., Sleath & Woodhams, 2014;Strömwall, Landström, & Alfredsson, 2014; although see Russell & Hand, 2017 for opposing views).…”
Section: Participants Also Completed the Acceptance Of Modern Myths Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of RMA has its roots in feminist theory, where rape is seen as a means by which men exert power over women. Researchers argue that RMA is pervasive and widely held in all levels of society (Bohner et al, 2009;Sleath & Woodhams, 2014). It correlates with Hostile and BS (Grubb & Turner, 2012).…”
Section: Rape Myth Acceptancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The myth includes the use of extreme violence (often including the use of a weapon) and the victim strongly resisting the attack physically and sustaining injuries (Clay-Warner & McMahon-Howard, 2009;Du Mont et al, 2003). In a comparison with studies of real stranger rape cases, Sleath and Woodhams (2014) found students overestimated how frequently aspects of the 'real rape' myth (specifically, the violent offender and physically resistant victim behaviours) occur in rape cases. Thus, expectations of victim and offender behaviours appear to comply with the 'real rape' myth more than real cases of rape do.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%