OBJECTIVE-To determine the cost-effectiveness of medical and surgical management of early pregnancy loss DESIGN-In the multi-center trial, 652 women with first-trimester pregnancy failure were randomized to medical or surgical management. Analyses of cost, effectiveness and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and utilities were conducted.
SETTING-Analysis of data from a multi-center trial
PATEINTS-Secondary analysis of a multi-center trial
INTERVENTIONS-Cost effective analysisMAIN OUTCOME-Cost and effectiveness of competing treatment strategies RESULTS-Cost analysis of treatment demonstrates an increased cost of $336 for 13% increased efficacy of surgical management. This analysis was sensitive to the probability of extra office visit, cost of visit, and probability of success. When the surgical arm is divided into outpatient manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) versus inpatient electric vacuum aspiration (EVA), there is increased cost of $745 for EVA, but decreased cost of $202 for MVA, compared with medical management. In general, MVA was found to be more cost-effective than medical management. For treatment of incomplete or inevitable abortion, medical management was found to be less