2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.07.22.215350
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expectancy changes the self-monitoring of voice identity

Abstract: Self-voice attribution can become difficult when voice characteristics are ambiguous, and functional magnetic resonance imagines (fMRI) investigations of such ambiguity are sparse. We utilized voice-morphing (self-other) to manipulate (un-)certainty in self-voice attribution in a button-press paradigm. This allowed investigating how levels of self-voice certainty alter brain activation in regions monitoring voice identity areas and unexpected changes in voice playback quality. FMRI results confirm a self-voice… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 147 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The paradigm (adapted from Johnson et al, 2021; Ott & Jäncke, 2013) consisted of three conditions (Figure 2A). In all three conditions, the trial began with the presentation of a fixation cross, followed by a cue (< left, > right) at 0.4 – 1.0 s after trial onset.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The paradigm (adapted from Johnson et al, 2021; Ott & Jäncke, 2013) consisted of three conditions (Figure 2A). In all three conditions, the trial began with the presentation of a fixation cross, followed by a cue (< left, > right) at 0.4 – 1.0 s after trial onset.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MIS is modulated by stimulus properties, including the predictability of the frequency and timing of tones (Bäss et al, 2008; Knolle et al, 2013a) or manipulations of voice identity (Johnson et al, 2021), voice quality and timing in speech (Aliu et al, 2009; Behroozmand & Larson, 2011). In a study comparing different utterances of the same vowel, self- or externally generated, Niziolek and colleagues (2013) observed greater suppression when the utterance showed formant ratios more prototypical for the individual speaker.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the triple-network model, information transfer from inferior frontal hypersalient and central executive engagement resulting in activation of the temporal speech regions may correspond structurally with the anterior AF segment. Indeed, the right IFG has shown increased activity in monitoring unexpected features of auditory and voice feedback 94,95 . Further, the HP-related increases in the FA of the right posterior AF reported here suggest a contribution of structural connections to a sense of agency over external stimuli.…”
Section: Fronto-temporo-parietal Network Top-down/bottom-up Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%