1976
DOI: 10.1177/009579847600200209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expectancies about Achievement and Achievement: The Sense of Internal-External Control and Academic Performance among Black High School Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each of these studies reported findings suggesting that the simple internal-external dichotomy was not adequate to capture the relationship between control and other motivationally relevant variables. For example, both Lao (1970) and Jorgensen (1976) found positive relations between academic achievement and internality on Personal Control (i.e., first-person items), but not Control ideology (third-person items). Only when African-American college subjects believed that they personally controlled their own reinforcements did academic achievement increase.…”
Section: Race-homogeneous Researchmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Each of these studies reported findings suggesting that the simple internal-external dichotomy was not adequate to capture the relationship between control and other motivationally relevant variables. For example, both Lao (1970) and Jorgensen (1976) found positive relations between academic achievement and internality on Personal Control (i.e., first-person items), but not Control ideology (third-person items). Only when African-American college subjects believed that they personally controlled their own reinforcements did academic achievement increase.…”
Section: Race-homogeneous Researchmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although several conceptualizations could be presented explicating proposed relationships of psychosocial factors to academic and behavioral functioning, a presentation of that magnitude is beyond the scope of this article (for reviews, see Barbarin, 1983;Bronfenbrenner, 1979;Christenson, Rounds, & Gorney, 1992;Cunningham & Spencer, 2000;Garcia Coll et al, 1996;McLoyd, 1990;Slaughter & Epps, 1987). In general, these conceptualizations appear to converge on the postulation that academic and behavioral functioning are influenced by parenting practices (Chapman & Mullis, 1999;Clark, Novak, & Dupree, 2002;Johnson & Pandina, 1991;McAdoo & McAdoo, 2001;Paulson, Marchant, & Rothlisberg, 1998), youth attitudes (Eccles & Wigfield, 1985;Jessor, Turbin, & Costa, 1998;Jorgensen, 1976), and types of peer associations (Brendgen, Vitaro, Turgeon, & Poulin, 2002;Dekovic, 1999;Ellenbogen & Chamberland, 1997;Ge, Brody, Conger, Simons, & Murray, 2002;Gonzales, Cauce, Friedman, & Mason, 1996;Jessor et al, 1998). From a social learning perspective, youth learn affective and behavioral regulatory strategies via observing the actions of such models as parents and peers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%