2012
DOI: 10.1515/mammalia-2012-0031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expansion of the known range of Marmosops incanus (Mammalia, Didelphimorphia, Didelphinae) to the right bank of the São Francisco River in north-east Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…cur in the Atlantic Forest of Sergipe (Oliver and Santos, 1991;Stevens and Husband, 1998;Oliveira et al, 2005;Chagas et al, 2010;Rocha et al, 2012). Considering only surveys based on procedures comparable to those applied in the present study, species richness varied considerably, from nine at the Serra de Itabaiana National Park (Oliveira et al, 2005) and Morro Grande Forest Reserve to 36 at the EPDA-Peti reserve in Minas Gerais (Paglia et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…cur in the Atlantic Forest of Sergipe (Oliver and Santos, 1991;Stevens and Husband, 1998;Oliveira et al, 2005;Chagas et al, 2010;Rocha et al, 2012). Considering only surveys based on procedures comparable to those applied in the present study, species richness varied considerably, from nine at the Serra de Itabaiana National Park (Oliveira et al, 2005) and Morro Grande Forest Reserve to 36 at the EPDA-Peti reserve in Minas Gerais (Paglia et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Filling the vast knowledge gaps in the Northeastern region (or even further in the South) is important not only for the understanding of the diversity of mammals within this region in general, but also the local distribution of specific taxa. A number of recent studies have redefined the local ranges of species such as Bradypus torquatus Illiger, 1811(Chagas et al, 2010 and Marmosops incanus (Rocha et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%