2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings 2014
DOI: 10.1109/fie.2014.7044067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expanding women in undergraduate engineering: A mixed-methods analysis of recruitment cultures, practices, and policies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is discussed in a paper written through Virginia Tech. Our study highlights three themes consistent across the institutions: 1) institutional commitment and self-awareness, 2) strategic admissions policies and "high touch" efforts, and 3) integrated outreach programs 10 .…”
Section: Admission Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is discussed in a paper written through Virginia Tech. Our study highlights three themes consistent across the institutions: 1) institutional commitment and self-awareness, 2) strategic admissions policies and "high touch" efforts, and 3) integrated outreach programs 10 .…”
Section: Admission Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Institutions with a history of commitment to diversity tend to be more successful in recruitment, 7 and institutions which have already established a critical mass of women have a much easier time maintaining a more balanced gender ratio since the presence of women creates the perception that women have the abilities and interests to succeed in engineering. 5 Female role models and special mentorships for women have also been helpful for increasing self-efficacy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…comprise over 50% of the overall undergraduate student body, while women represent only 18% of the student population in engineering. 7 Issues of recruitment and retention are caused by a complex combination of factors, but there is empirical support for the belief that high school context is a crucial factor in determining future plans to pursue STEM. 6,9 Currently, only 13% of high school females express interest in STEM, 16 and only 1%-4% express interest in engineering, 8 but the gender gap can be reduced by 25% or more in schools which support girls' interests in STEM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The difficulty of recruiting and retaining women in engineering stems from a variety of factors which can be summarized by several themes: low self-efficacy in STEM 4,12 , differing expectations for male and female students 2 , curricula which do not emphasize real-world problem solving 7 , and a lack of institutional commitment to diversity 11 . Outreach efforts which address some or all of these factors have been effective for encouraging women to pursue engineering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%