2019
DOI: 10.1111/glob.12257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expanding transnational care networks: comparing caring for families with caring for homes

Abstract: Although many factors may motivate a migrant to own a house in their country of origin, significant practical labour is needed to maintain it, as both a material structure intended for shelter and as a symbolic object reflecting attachment to a place of origin. Most research in this area focuses on the significance accorded to transnational houses by their owners and families connoted by the ‘myth of return’, but little attention has been given to how the labour of ownership – constructing, maintaining, overse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(138 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This does not hold only in an instrumental sense, as is typical of an investment aiming to save money, diversify risk, gain profit or transfer wealth across generations (Osili 2004). The point is that while the house may not turn into a migrant's home in the short term, it is invariably conceived, desired, and tentatively materialised as such (López 2015;Schaab and Wagner 2020). Whatever its actual function (s), it is inherently meaningful as long as it is expected to host its builders and owners in the future (what we might refer to as a deeper rationale).…”
Section: Temporalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This does not hold only in an instrumental sense, as is typical of an investment aiming to save money, diversify risk, gain profit or transfer wealth across generations (Osili 2004). The point is that while the house may not turn into a migrant's home in the short term, it is invariably conceived, desired, and tentatively materialised as such (López 2015;Schaab and Wagner 2020). Whatever its actual function (s), it is inherently meaningful as long as it is expected to host its builders and owners in the future (what we might refer to as a deeper rationale).…”
Section: Temporalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, remittance houses should be appreciated as agents of transnational connectedness in their own right (Dalakoglou 2010;Schaab and Wagner 2020). They significantly affect the mobile interactions between migrants and their stayer counterparts.…”
Section: Cross-border Connectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic makes it difficult to predict the course of future events. Further examination of social remittances during global crises has the potential to contribute to studies on transnational social protection practices (Lafleur & Romero, 2018 ; Schaab & Wagner, 2020 ). Moreover, the issue of informal practice exchange within transnational families and its effect on policy circulation and diffusion processes can also be of interest to researchers and policy makers in the context of limiting disinformation and promoting safety measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether such houses are completed or not, taken care of or not, inhabited or not, they have something to 'say' on the reach, contents and durability of the transnational ties of their owners (Boccagni 2017a). A 'remittance house', as the recent literature shows, is central to the material, affective and moral economy of the interactions between migrants and their close family members, as long as the latter live in the context of origin (López 2015;Schaab and Wagner 2020). Its very existence testifies to migrants' economic and moral engagement to 'be there' in some way, and possibly return in the future.…”
Section: Feeling At Home Transnationallymentioning
confidence: 99%