2019
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1906349116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expanding the stoichiometric window for metal cross-linked gel assembly using competition

Abstract: Polymer networks with dynamic cross-links have generated widespread interest as tunable and responsive viscoelastic materials. However, narrow stoichiometric limits in cross-link compositions are typically imposed in the assembly of these materials to prevent excess free cross-linker from dissolving the resulting polymer networks. Here we demonstrate how the presence of molecular competition allows for vast expansion of the previously limited range of cross-linker concentrations that result in robust network a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(41 reference statements)
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 1–4 ] In synthetic materials, reversible crosslinks mimicking those in mussels are often introduced into a covalently crosslinked polymer network, offering new handles to tune toughness, adhesion, and self‐healing. [ 5–13 ] For example, incorporation of Fe‐DOPA complexes into elastomers increases their bulk strength and toughness, [ 14 ] where enhancements in toughness arise from the breaking and reforming of reversible crosslinks. [ 5,6,14,15 ] However, the permanent structure of covalent hydrogels can limit their use for certain applications like injectable medical treatments, [ 16,17 ] (bio)adhesives, [ 18 ] or mechanically reversible materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[ 1–4 ] In synthetic materials, reversible crosslinks mimicking those in mussels are often introduced into a covalently crosslinked polymer network, offering new handles to tune toughness, adhesion, and self‐healing. [ 5–13 ] For example, incorporation of Fe‐DOPA complexes into elastomers increases their bulk strength and toughness, [ 14 ] where enhancements in toughness arise from the breaking and reforming of reversible crosslinks. [ 5,6,14,15 ] However, the permanent structure of covalent hydrogels can limit their use for certain applications like injectable medical treatments, [ 16,17 ] (bio)adhesives, [ 18 ] or mechanically reversible materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To coordinate with metal ions, ligands must be deprotonated, and the concentration of available deprotonated ligands relative to the concentration of available metal ions determines the distribution of ligand coordination modalities at equilibrium within the network. [ 9,10 ] Hence, the distribution of crosslinking modalities can be tuned by changing pH (to control deprotonation) or changing the metal to ligand (M:L) ratio, which in turn dictates the viscoelastic properties of the bulk network. [ 9,19 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure scalability, we end-functionalize commercially available hydroxy-terminated linear PEG, analogous to nitrocatechol-functionalized linear PEGs. 51 We produce the hydrogels by dissolving 10 wt% 2gPEG in water and adding iron chloride (FeCl 3 ), selected because of the high affinity between pyrogallol and iron(III) (Fe 3+ ). For each pyrogallol end-group, we add twice the molar concentration of Fe 3+ to achieve gelation, a ratio higher than the stoichiometric ratio of 3 ligands per ion, known for catechol hydrogels, 20,23 resulting in a solution pH of 1.5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coupling of the histidine ligand to the polymer was performed by slightly modifying a procedure used elsewhere. [ 28,29 ] Briefly, 4‐arm star, 10 kDa PEG, terminated with NH 2 ⋅ HCl (four equivalence per polymer), was mixed with 1.5 equiv. Boc‐His(Trt)‐OH and 1.5 equiv.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 0.04 M histidine hydrogel was formed by modifying the method described elsewhere. [ 8,29 ] 97.6 μL of stock 4‐arm histidine was dispensed onto Parafilm along with a 1 M stock Ni2+, Co2+, Cu2+, or Zn2+, solution, a 4 M NaOH solution, and water so that the final hydrogel volume would be 200 μL. The total salt ion concentration was fixed at 0.08 M , representing a value twice the ligand concentration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%