2018
DOI: 10.1111/neup.12513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expanding the spectrum of pediatric NTRK‐rearranged fibroblastic tumors to the central nervous system: A case report with RBPMS‐NTRK3 fusion

Abstract: We report a case of a 20-month-old male presenting with seizures who was found to have a hyperintense lesion on T2-weighted images of magnetic resonance imaging in the left medial temporal lobe that was initially clinically and radiologically thought to be either low-grade glioma or focal cortical dysplasia. Histologic, immunohistochemical and molecular evaluation (array comparative genomic hybridization, Archer fusion panel) of the resection specimen demonstrated a highly infiltrative fibroblastic spindle cel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RBPMS, an RNA-binding protein, and MET, a proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase, have been identified as fusion partners in a variety of cancers with other genes and as gene fusion partners in a patient with cholangiocarcinoma [ 37 ]. Although MET fusions are uncommon drivers of sarcoma [ 38 ], a TFG-MET fusion has been reported in a patient with an infantile spindle cell sarcoma with neural features [ 37 , 39 , 40 ]. The interchromosomal in-frame fusion of RBPMS (ENST00000320203, exon 5) to MET (ENST00000318493, exon 15) juxtaposes the RNA recognition motif of RBPMS to the MET tyrosine kinase catalytic domain (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RBPMS, an RNA-binding protein, and MET, a proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase, have been identified as fusion partners in a variety of cancers with other genes and as gene fusion partners in a patient with cholangiocarcinoma [ 37 ]. Although MET fusions are uncommon drivers of sarcoma [ 38 ], a TFG-MET fusion has been reported in a patient with an infantile spindle cell sarcoma with neural features [ 37 , 39 , 40 ]. The interchromosomal in-frame fusion of RBPMS (ENST00000320203, exon 5) to MET (ENST00000318493, exon 15) juxtaposes the RNA recognition motif of RBPMS to the MET tyrosine kinase catalytic domain (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diverse histology of NTRK -fused gliomas overlaps with entities such as DIGG, GG, PXA, PA (including anaplastic), DA grades 2 and 3, and GBM in our study. In keeping with the wide spectrum of NTRK -fused CNS tumor histology, NTRK rearrangements have been previously reported in GBM [ 9 , 18 , 19 , 21 , 28 , 34 , 38 , 39 , 41 , 43 , 44 , 52 , 53 , 56 ], gliosarcoma [ 21 ], AA [ 9 , 18 , 21 , 52 ], diffuse midline glioma / DIPG [ 9 , 52 ], HGG [ 9 , 22 , 34 , 57 ], glioneuronal tumor (including high grade) [ 1 , 16 , 29 ], pilocytic astrocytoma (PA) (including anaplastic) [ 9 , 18 , 21 , 25 , 35 ], low grade astrocytroma with features of PA [ 26 ], PXA [ 55 ], GG [ 1 , 9 , 36 , 37 ], DIGG [ 6 , 9 ], LGG [ 18 , 34 , 44 , 50 , 53 ], glioma, not otherwise specified [ 9 , 18 ], neuroepithelial neoplasm [ 43 ], CNS fibroblastic tumor [ 47 ], primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET) [ 12 ], CNS embryonal tumor [ 14 ], and tumors with oligodendroglial or oligoastrocytic-like histology [ 12 , 21 , 29 , 37 , 55 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a single report of a TFG-MET fusion in an unusual S100-positive infantile spindle cell sarcoma ( Flucke et al 2017 ). In terms of RBPMS involvement, there are two prior reports of RBPMS-NTRK3 fusion positive sarcomas: an adult with a fibrosarcoma-like uterine sarcoma ( Chiang et al 2018 ) and a 20-mo-old with a fibroblastic central nervous system (CNS) tumor ( Torre et al 2018 ). Additionally, RBPMS-NRG1 fusions have been described in adult lung adenocarcinoma and renal cell carcinoma ( Jonna et al 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%