1992
DOI: 10.1080/03634529209378867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expanding the research agenda for instructional communication: Raising some unasked questions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scholars in communication have not only issued increased calls for diverse methodologies such as ethnography (Sprague, 1992) but also have indicated the importance of this work in understanding the ways in which cultures exist as communicative systems (Carbaugh, 1995;Hymes, 1962;Philipsen, 1992).…”
Section: Methodological Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Scholars in communication have not only issued increased calls for diverse methodologies such as ethnography (Sprague, 1992) but also have indicated the importance of this work in understanding the ways in which cultures exist as communicative systems (Carbaugh, 1995;Hymes, 1962;Philipsen, 1992).…”
Section: Methodological Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The place of communication in research and theory about education has only recently begun to be questioned (see, for example, Alexander, 1999;Sprague, 1992Sprague, , 1993Warren, 1999). Instructional communication research needs to focus both on providing information about skills and techniques for effective classroom management and teaching and to be reflexive about exercise of power/knowledge through the discourses that circulate both inside and outside of the classroom.…”
Section: Conclusion Revisiting Gender Through a Curriculum Of The Bodymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The process-product paradigm, which has informed a considerable amount of instructional communication scholarship, has largely cast the teacher-student relationship in terms of determining which instructional techniques/methods best maximize pre-defined indicators of student achievement. More recent work, however, predominantly from critical communication scholars (e.g., Alley-Young, 2005;Cooks, 2010;Fassett & Warren, 2007;Hendrix, Jackson, & Warren, 2003;Sprague, 1992Sprague, , 1993Warren, 2010), has highlighted the limitations of the paradigm and given much needed consideration to a host of socio-communicative phenomena that likewise affect the teaching and learning context. The humanistic approach, such as the one characterized in this report, similarly marks a sharp departure from traditional communication pedagogy by dedicating generous attention to the developmental needs, interests, and personal histories of individual students.…”
Section: Summary and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%