2014
DOI: 10.1111/cge.12544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expanding the phenotype of a recurrent de novo variant in PACS1 causing intellectual disability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding of an identical de novo c.607C>T mutation in two individuals that shared strikingly similar clinical findings, suggested that mutations in PACS1 define a recognizable syndromic form of intellectual disability. A recent report on a third patient with an identical mutation and a similar facial appearance and comparable clinical presentation provided further confirmation of a specific recognizable PACS1-related syndrome [Gadzicki et al, 2014]. In the present publication we report 16 further cases (9 male and 7 female) ages 2-21 years, with the recurrent de novo c.607C>T mutation in PACS1.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This finding of an identical de novo c.607C>T mutation in two individuals that shared strikingly similar clinical findings, suggested that mutations in PACS1 define a recognizable syndromic form of intellectual disability. A recent report on a third patient with an identical mutation and a similar facial appearance and comparable clinical presentation provided further confirmation of a specific recognizable PACS1-related syndrome [Gadzicki et al, 2014]. In the present publication we report 16 further cases (9 male and 7 female) ages 2-21 years, with the recurrent de novo c.607C>T mutation in PACS1.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…All mutations reported here were identified by exome sequencing, and the patients were evaluated in human genetics centers. Previous genetic testing by conventional karyotyping, microarray analysis or targeted gene analysis did not reveal abnormalities, with the exception of a total of five inherited rare CNVs that were detected by microarray analysis in four individuals: two paternally inherited deletions in individual 3 (a 117 kb deletion in 2q13 and a 108 kb deletion in 16p13.2) [Gadzicki et al, 2014], a paternally inherited deletion of 150 kb in 7q11.23 in individual 11, a paternally inherited duplication of 600 kb in 11p11.12, and a 673 kb duplication in 14q32.33 of unknown inheritance in individual 18. All these rare CNVs were considered benign and do not contribute to the phenotype.…”
Section: Geneticsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PACS1 p.R203W has been reported previously as a de novo variant from whole-exome sequencing in three unrelated male patients with intellectual disability and similar facial dysmorphisms (Gadzicki et al, 2015; Helbig et al, 2016). Two of these patients had seizures in the neonatal period similar to Patient 5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…A recurrent de novo missense variant, p.Arg203Trp was identified within the binding domain of PACS1 in nineteen individuals [1-3] who all share an overlapping phenotype including intellectual disability (ID), delayed language development, dysmorphic craniofacial features, and seizures [1-3]. Using whole exome sequencing (WES), we identified eight additional individuals with the same p.Arg203Trp missense variant in PACS1 that we demonstrated were de novo in seven individuals with available parental DNA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%