Expanding the notion of ‘ownership’ in participatory research involving teachers and researchers

Abstract

This article provides a conceptual discussion of 'ownership' in various forms of participatory research. The discussion is grounded in our experiences from three research projects in science education. We seek to understand how and why ownership may be distributed between teachers and researchers at different stages in the research process. Looking at our projects in retrospect, we see that ownership was differently distributed at the initial stages. Then ownership distribution followed a similar pathway, as teachers gained ownership of implementation, whereas researchers reclaimed ownership of analyzing and disseminating the work. Our discussion departs from the idea that ownership relates to both 'risks' and 'benefits' as well as to both 'rights' and 'obligations'. Thereby, we can make visible some of the circumstances that steer ownership towards the teachers or researchers. For example, we highlight that ownership distribution may be influenced by guidelines for research ethics and inequalities in terms of administrative support structures available to researchers and teachers. Based on our discussion, we suggest a number of questions to initiate and support a continuous dialogue between teachers and researchers who plan to engage in participatory research.

Promoting Well-being Among Informal Caregivers of People With HIV/AIDS in Rural Malawi: Community-Based Participatory Research Approach

“…We consider such a participatory approach to be most beneficial when engaging with underserved groups in particular. Indeed, co-designing activities and tools with the participants is useful and desirable when it comes to the implementation of effective community initiatives, as also demonstrated in the literature [62]. However, on the other hand, there is a risk of bias in research findings, in the sense that they are positively skewed, because of an overly positive attitude of participants toward a project.…”

Evaluating together with the target group: lessons from the development of a participatory evaluation tool

“…De verschillen die vaak bestaan tussen onderzoekers en professionals in bijvoorbeeld tijd, middelen, expertise, belangen en taal kunnen ertoe leiden dat het onderzoeksperspectief het praktijkperspectief overheerst [9][10][11], met als gevolg dat het ontwikkelde product uiteindelijk niet goed aansluit bij de praktijk [11]. Daarom hebben we in het ontwikkelingsproces actief aandacht besteed aan het creëren van gelijkwaardige samenwerking: een samenwerking waarin het onderzoeksperspectief en het praktijkperspectief evenveel gewicht krijgen.…”

Participatory hackathon to determine ecological relevant endpoints for a neurotoxin to aquatic and benthic invertebrates

“…One option to solve this is participatory research, which has the potential for broad screening and effective data collection (Strasser et al 2019 ). Participatory research originated in healthcare but has lately transferred into other disciplines, including sustainability questions (Lang et al 2012 ) and teaching situations (Areljung et al 2021 ). Its foundation is that researchers receive help from volunteering participants, such as students or the public (Gibson et al 2017 ).…”