2014
DOI: 10.1080/10130950.2014.883704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expanding the memory catalogue: Southern African women's contributions to memory-work writing as a feminist research methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our collaborative process of exploring the afterlife of our self-study doctoral research contributes to the evolving body of work on memory-work as a research method and as a method for professional development (e.g., Mitchell & Pithouse-Morgan, 2014;Mitchell & Weber, 1998, 1999Samaras, 2011). Through our dialogic memory-work, we came to realize that our "remembering has less to do with the past itself than with the needs and situations that confront human beings in the present" (Mattson, 2013, p. 198).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our collaborative process of exploring the afterlife of our self-study doctoral research contributes to the evolving body of work on memory-work as a research method and as a method for professional development (e.g., Mitchell & Pithouse-Morgan, 2014;Mitchell & Weber, 1998, 1999Samaras, 2011). Through our dialogic memory-work, we came to realize that our "remembering has less to do with the past itself than with the needs and situations that confront human beings in the present" (Mattson, 2013, p. 198).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article demonstrates how we have combined the methods of memory-work (Mitchell & Pithouse-Morgan, 2014;Mitchell & Weber, 1998, 1999 and reflexive dialogue (Pithouse-Morgan & Van Laren, 2012) to construct a dialogic memory-work method. Our intention is to seek a dialogic understanding where new "meaning … arises when different perspectives are brought together" (Wegerif, 2006, p. 146), as well as a reflexive understanding where we pay careful, selfcritical attention to our development as researchers and teacher educators (Kirk, 2005).…”
Section: Our Dialogic Memory-work Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having identified the commonalities and differences discussed above, we worked together and exchanged our views about the commonalities as advised by Mitchell and Pithouse-Morgan (2014). We were moving back and forth from the particular to the general as we worked with our objects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bridget wrote a poem depicting her interpretation of her image in relation to her literacy journey. This exercise followed the advice of Mitchell and Pithouse-Morgan (2014) who recommended that participants write independently about their memories.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first is a methodological contribution to collective biography (Davies & Gannon, 2006) in that we ask how memory and experience (Haug et al, 1987) is shaped and shapes the self and informs the process of writing, sharing, discussing, revising, and analyzing stories of gendered subjectification. In the second we add to the small body of work (Mitchell & Weber, 2003;O'Reilly-Scanlon, 2002;Mitchell & Pithouse-Morgan, 2014;Pithouse-Morgan, Mitchell, & Pillay, 2012;Pithouse-Morgan & van Laren, 2015) that puts memory work and collective biography in dialogue with the self-study of teaching practices. Building from the first two, the third contribution explores implications and speculations of working with collective biography with family members-son and mother who share shared memories-as we seek to better understand the construction of our subjectivities (past and present) in pursuit of improving our working with difference as scholars and teachers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%