2022
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.865848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expanding the Editing Window of Cytidine Base Editors With the Rad51 DNA-Binding Domain in Rice

Abstract: Recently developed base editors provide a powerful tool for plant research and crop improvement. Although a number of different deaminases and Cas proteins have been used to improve base editors the editing efficiency, and editing window are still not optimal. Fusion of a non-sequence-specific single-stranded DNA-binding domain (DBD) from the human Rad51 protein between Cas9 nickase and the deaminase has been reported to dramatically increase the editing efficiency and expand the editing window of base editors… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We show that our Leishmania -optimised hyBE4max CBE version increases the editing efficiency ( Figure 7B and Figure 7—figure supplement 1C ). However, it remains to be explored whether also fidelity and editing window size is affected by this modification, as for example hyBE4max adaptations in rise are known to have expanded the editing windows ( Wei et al, 2022 ). While especially our improved CBE version allowed to efficiently induce a knockdown of CRK3, guides targeting IFT88 were not significantly depleted in our small-scale library screen ( Figure 7B ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We show that our Leishmania -optimised hyBE4max CBE version increases the editing efficiency ( Figure 7B and Figure 7—figure supplement 1C ). However, it remains to be explored whether also fidelity and editing window size is affected by this modification, as for example hyBE4max adaptations in rise are known to have expanded the editing windows ( Wei et al, 2022 ). While especially our improved CBE version allowed to efficiently induce a knockdown of CRK3, guides targeting IFT88 were not significantly depleted in our small-scale library screen ( Figure 7B ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We show that our Leishmania -optimised hyBE4max CBE version increases the editing efficiency (Figure 7B and S11C). However, it remains to be explored whether also fidelity and editing window size is affected by this modification, as for example hyBE4max adaptations in rise are known to have expanded the editing windows (77). While especially our improved CBE version allowed to efficiently induce a knockdown of CRK3, guides targeting IFT88 were not significantly depleted in our small-scale library screen (Figure 7B).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Base editors have a more restricted targeting capacity, owing to their precise editing of a single nucleotide, which may hinder the design of these newer therapeutics requiring editing far beyond a single KO. New base editors containing different PAMs, extended editing windows, or enhanced catalytic activity may solve this potential problem [143][144][145]. Extending base editor target accessibility to match that of traditional CRISPR-Cas9 may be required for full therapeutic capacity of this platform.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%