Purpose: We examined the performance of a familial risk assessment method that stratifies risk for early-onset coronary heart disease by considering the number of relatives with coronary disease, degree of relationship, lineage, and age at diagnosis. Methods: By using data from the HealthStyles 2003 survey, we assessed the associations between familial risk and early-onset coronary heart disease, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, and obesity. By using area under the curve statistics, we evaluated the discriminatory ability of various risk assessment models. Results: Of 4035 respondents, 60% were female and 72% were white, with a mean age of 48.8 years. After adjustment for demographics, strong and moderate risk were significantly associated with approximately a five-and twofold risk of early-onset coronary disease, respectively. After adjustment for demographics and personal history of cardiovascular disease, strong familial risk was also significantly associated with diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, and obesity. A risk assessment model that included familial risk, demographics, and personal history of diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, and obesity was most optimal with an area under the curve statistic of 87.2%. Conclusions: Familial risk assessment can stratify risk for early-onset coronary heart disease. Several conditions associated with increased familial risk can be prevented. Family history is one of the most important risk factors for early-onset coronary heart disease (CHD). Many studies have found an increase in CHD of approximately two-to threefold given a first-degree relative with CHD, 1-4 and the strength of this association increases as the number of affected first-degree relatives increases 5-10 and with younger ages of CHD onset. 1,[5][6][7]9,[11][12][13] Studies that have investigated family histories of late-onset CHD have also found significant positive associations with CHD, although the relative risks are comparatively smaller. 5,6,9,[11][12][13] Recent studies have demonstrated an increased CHD risk associated with CHD in second-degree relatives, 14,15 and in maternal relatives, 13 although other studies have not found an association between CHD and lineage. 4,7,10,16 Despite the importance of family history as a CHD risk factor, it is underused in CHD prevention efforts. Many standard risk assessment methods and guidelines underrate the significance of family history. [17][18][19][20] If considered at all, assessment is generally limited to early-onset CHD in first-degree relatives only. Many clinicians are also reluctant to assess family history as a disease risk factor because of concerns about the amount of time required to collect the information and their ability to interpret the information accurately. [21][22][23][24] To address these barriers, several national organizations and federal agencies have endorsed the development and use of family history tools, particularly for common chronic diseases, such as CHD, diabetes, and cancer. [25][26][27][...