Expanding the boundaries of the discipline: The 30th‐anniversary issue of <i>Production and Operations Management</i>

Kumar, Subodha; Tang, Christopher S.

doi:10.1111/poms.13846

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 42 publications

(56 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As a second positive, we are seeing meaningful coauthorship from healthcare authors, typically medical school faculty, for the first time. This follows calls to link supply chain and logistics to the medical response to COVID (Kumar & Tang, 2022), and several pandemic-based articles in this 2020-2022 series were subsequently coauthored with healthcare scholars. Still, other articles with healthcare scholars in this series did not specifically relate to the pandemic.…”

Section: Practitioner Relevancementioning

confidence: 99%

Supply chain management research productivity and topics: 2020–2022

Maloni,

Franza,

Lowman

et al. 2024

Transp. j.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article continues the longest‐standing evaluation of publication productivity in the academic field of supply chain with the combined series spanning 55 years. In this edition, we update the schools and individual scholars producing the most supply chain publications from 2020 to 2022. Despite a new top‐ranked school, the top 10 list remains largely consistent with previous editions, as does the core set of top supply chain doctoral programs. In contrast, the list of the remaining top 25 schools continues to change and includes more international (i.e., non‐U.S.) schools. Additionally, the barriers to entry to become a strong supply chain research school are lower than in the past, while author concentration analyses confirm that the supply chain scholarly field has become more dispersed. Combined, the results support not only highly productive authors and schools with recognition and resource requests but also aspiring authors and schools with their research paths and benchmarking. We voice concerns, however, about both the supply of new supply chain scholars and the decreasing authorship of industry practitioners that had been a staple of our applied field. As a further contribution, we organize the most frequent keywords since 2020 to help scholars identify contemporary and understudied topics.

show abstract

Section: Practitioner Relevancementioning

confidence: 99%

Supply chain management research productivity and topics: 2020–2022

Maloni,

Franza,

Lowman

et al. 2024

Transp. j.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Trends and Patterns in the Key Attributes of the 24 Top Business Journals: 2001–2021

Mithas,

Silveira

2024

Production and Operations Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We document trends and patterns in the key attributes of the 24 top journals during 2001–2021 using data from the Web of Science. These trends include growth by disciplines and journals represented among selected journals in terms of growth in publications, relative publication share of disciplines, number of unique authors, attributes of prolific authors, and the extent of interdisciplinary contributions. We compare and contrast our findings with prior studies and offer a few conjectures on similarities and differences in the findings. We hope that our descriptive findings will spur further research on the production function of science and help identify the determinants of research productivity in top journals.

show abstract

Expanding the boundaries of the discipline: The 30th‐anniversary issue of Production and Operations Management

Cited by 2 publications

References 42 publications

Supply chain management research productivity and topics: 2020–2022

Supply chain management research productivity and topics: 2020–2022

Trends and Patterns in the Key Attributes of the 24 Top Business Journals: 2001–2021

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About