Expanding the Boundaries of Female Honour in Early Modern England

Abstract

Within the historiography of gender and reputation in early modern Europe, female and male honour are usually presented as being incommensurable; yet they are constantly compared. Female honour has been discussed primarily in the context of sexual reputation. Male honour is commonly imagined as ‘more complex’, involving matters of deference, physical prowess, economic and professional competence and die avoidance of public ridicule. Thus the predominant model of gendered honour has been oppositional—female to male, private to public, passive to active, individual to collective and, by extension, chastity to deeds. Such a model, however, is misconceived. Just as the honour of men could be bound up with sexuality and the body, so these constituted merely one—albeit powerful—concomitant of feminine honour. Sexual probity was indeed central to the dominant discourse of early modern gender ideology, and historians have quite properly noted the significance of a social code of female honour ‘which was overwhelmingly seen in sexual terms’. But the potency of this discourse has itself frequently led to the selection of sources in which sexual conduct and reputation are central issues, and in which sexual constructions of female dishonour are immediately visible Because women's honour has effectively been imagined in terms of dishonour, constructions of shame—especially those associated with sexuality and sexual behaviour—have been privileged over, or compounded with, those of affront. Even when it has been noted that sexual insult could be a mundane response ‘in every sort of local and personal conflict’, conceptualisations of women's honour have been defined overwhelmingly by the nature of such responses rather than the conflicts themselves.

Women Behaving Badly: Gender and Aggression in a Military Town, 1653?1781

“…Unfortunately, the sessions papers do not tell us why so many people, women as well as men, routinely flew into a rage. But our findings do seem to complement those of Gowing (1996), Dbhoiwala (1996), and Walker (1996, each of whom has argued that early modern women defined their honour in far broader terms than we have been led to believe. A reputation for chastity, in other words, was only one component of what constituted women's honour.…”

‘I Am Talking About It Because I Want to Stop It’: Child Sexual Abuse and Sexual Violence Against Women in British South Asian Communities

“…However, the importance of the notion of 'honour' is not declining in societies around the world. As an evaluative term, it can be applied (at least to some degree) to any society (Pitt-Rivers, 1966), but over time its meaning has largely become assimilated into, and its usage replaced by, alternative words, such as reputation, honesty, virtue, chastity, chivalry and bravery (Walker, 1996;. The problem of defining 'honour' for academic purposes is exacerbated when it is examined in terms of how it operates across cultural, spatial and temporal boundaries.…”

Reproducing plantation society: Women and land in colonial South Carolina

“…Housewifery was a counterpart to husbandry in early modern England. It defined a sphere of duties associated with managing a rural household, such as keeping a house, garden, orchard, and dairy (Treckle, 1996;Walker, 1996). White Carolinians stretched this "huswife" ideal to ascribe value to women's work in the colonial subtropics.…”