2021
DOI: 10.22452/jml.vol31no2.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expanding Students’ Choices in Language Education

Abstract: Many teachers seem interested in their classes being more student-centered. Students making more choices about their own learning forms a key aspect of student-centered learning, as well as life-long learning. This article offers ideas for ways to provide students with more choices in their learning and suggests ways to encourage students to make choices when given opportunities to do so. These ideas for increasing student choice include extensive reading, cooperative learning, multiple intelligences, service … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accommodating different choices of type of text, genre, and length of the book is important as a good selection of various books encourages participants to read. For this reason, most universities provide the opportunity for their students to select books based on their preferences, which happens to be in line with one of the principles of Extensive Reading, i.e., students choose what they want to read (Day & Bamford as cited by Jacobs & Renandya, 2021;Nation & Waring, 2019;Robb, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accommodating different choices of type of text, genre, and length of the book is important as a good selection of various books encourages participants to read. For this reason, most universities provide the opportunity for their students to select books based on their preferences, which happens to be in line with one of the principles of Extensive Reading, i.e., students choose what they want to read (Day & Bamford as cited by Jacobs & Renandya, 2021;Nation & Waring, 2019;Robb, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%