Expanding retrieval practice promotes short-term retention, but equally spaced retrieval enhances long-term retention.

Abstract

Expanding retrieval practice (T. K. Landauer & R. A. Bjork, 1978) is regarded as a superior technique for promoting long-term retention relative to equally spaced retrieval practice. In Experiments 1 and 2, the authors found that expanding retrieval practice of vocabulary word pairs produced short-term benefits 10 min after learning, conceptually replicating Landauer and Bjork's results. However, equally spaced retrieval produced superior retention 2 days later. This pattern occurred both with and without feedback after test trials. In Experiment 3, the 1st test occurred immediately or after a brief delay, and repeated tests were expanding or equally spaced. Delaying the first test improved long-term retention, regardless of how the repeated tests were spaced. The important factor for promoting long-term retention is delaying initial retrieval to make it more difficult, as is done in equally spaced retrieval but not in expanding retrieval. Expanding the interval between repeated tests had little effect on long-term retention in 3 experiments.

Spreading the words: A spacing effect in vocabulary learning

“…Second, the spaced words were always studied first. Some studies found a better performance on the massed items than on the spaced items during practice (e.g., Karpicke & Roediger, 2007). In our study, we did not find this difference, which may indicate that spaced items gained some processing advantage due to being studied first.…”

Pharmacy Student Self-Testing as a Predictor of Examination Performance

“…[17][18][19] Many of these investigations used free recall formats to demonstrate retained information and learning. 9,12,[17][18][19][20] However, other laboratory and classroom-based investigations have documented that self-testing with multiple-choice questions American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 2014; 78 (2) Article 32.…”

Neural Substrates for Reversing Stimulus–Outcome and Stimulus–Response Associations

“…Within each mini-block, 8 of the 32 characters repeated 10 times. The trials were presented in mini-blocks to help control the inter-repetition interval (IRI) for each stimulus, a variable that has been shown to influence learning difficulty as well as retention of learning (Karpicke and Roediger, 2007). This design had an average IRI of eight trials, which our pilot data suggested would produce an appropriate level of difficulty for learning.…”