2004
DOI: 10.1190/1.1778243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expanded uncertainty quantification in inverse problems: Hierarchical Bayes and empirical Bayes

Abstract: A common way to account for uncertainty in inverse problems is to apply Bayes' rule and obtain a posterior distribution of the quantities of interest given a set of measurements. A conventional Bayesian treatment, however, requires assuming specific values for parameters of the prior distribution and of the distribution of the measurement errors (e.g., the standard deviation of the errors). In practice, these parameters are often poorly known a priori, and choosing a particular value is often problematic. More… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
221
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 259 publications
(221 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
221
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This allows us to take into account also the uncertainty on the geomagnetic reversal timescale used to time finite rotations. Similarly, the uncertainty of each model is parameterized within the model itself 19 (hierarchical approach) to account for our ignorance on the noise magnitude, and thus on how close to the data a given model should be in order for the latter to be considered a faithful realization of the true temporal trends. As Euler vectors may change position or angular velocity independently, the sole constraint we impose on the ensemble consists of requiring latitude and longitude to change simultaneously, but independently from the residual angle.…”
Section: Trans-dimensional Hierarchical Bayesian Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This allows us to take into account also the uncertainty on the geomagnetic reversal timescale used to time finite rotations. Similarly, the uncertainty of each model is parameterized within the model itself 19 (hierarchical approach) to account for our ignorance on the noise magnitude, and thus on how close to the data a given model should be in order for the latter to be considered a faithful realization of the true temporal trends. As Euler vectors may change position or angular velocity independently, the sole constraint we impose on the ensemble consists of requiring latitude and longitude to change simultaneously, but independently from the residual angle.…”
Section: Trans-dimensional Hierarchical Bayesian Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we tackle noise in finite rotations by using a trans-dimensional hierarchical Bayesian framework [17][18][19][20][21] (Methods). We find that changes in the temporal trends of plate motions occur on timescales no shorter than a few million years, yielding simpler kinematic patterns and more plausible dynamics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MCMC is generally cast in a Bayesian framework and is widely used in geophysical inversion (Mosegaard and Tarantola, 1995;Stoffa, 1995, 1996;Curtis and Lomax, 2001;Mosegaard and Sambridge, 2002;Sambridge and Mosegaard, 2002;Malinverno and Briggs, 2004;Malinverno and Leaney, 2005) and particularly in seismic inversion (Godfrey et al, 1980;Mosegaard et al, 1997;Eidsvik et al, 2004;Hong and Sen, 2009;van der Burg et al, 2009;Martin et al, 2012;Chen and Glinsky, 2014).…”
Section: Brief Overview Of Conventional Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uncertainty in geophysical inverse problems was estimated by various stochastic inversion algorithms, such as MCMC (Liu and Stock, 1993;Malinverno and Briggs, 2004;Chen and Dickens, 2009;Gunning et al, 2010;Kwon and Snieder, 2011), SA (Dosso, 2002;Dosso and Nielsen, 2002;Bhattacharya et al, 2003;Roy et al, 2005;Varela et al, 2006), PSO (Fernández-Martínez et al, 2012;Rumpf and Tronicke, 2015), and rjMCMC Reading and Gallagher, 2013;Dadi, 2014;Galetti et al, 2015;Dadi et al, 2015).…”
Section: Uncertainty Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the error levels are distributed uniformly on a logarithmic scale between these bounds. Estimating the measurement errors amounts to hierarchical Bayesian inference (e.g., Bodin et al, 2012;Malinverno and Briggs, 2004).…”
Section: Model Parameterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%