1978
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1978.tb02458.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expanded Statistical Tables for Estimating Significance in Paired—preference, Paired–difference, Duo–trio and Triangle Tests

Abstract: Two sets of expanded tables have been compiled for use in determining significance in paireddifference and triangle tests (one-tailed) and in paired-preference tests (two-tailed). One set of tables lists the number of correct responses (or agreeing judgments) for trials ranging from 7-100, at p < 0.05, 0.04, 0.03, 0.02, 0.01, 0.005 and 0.001. These tables are convenient for a quick estimate of significance of laboratory sensory data as well as consumer responses. The second set of tables gives the probabilitie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
218
1
14

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 408 publications
(242 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(1 reference statement)
2
218
1
14
Order By: Relevance
“…In the taste assessment test, 15 out of the 31 panelists could taste a difference between the pumpkins fertilized with urine and those fertilized with mineral fertilizer, but this was not statistically significant (Roessler et al 1978). However, 16/31 panelists could differentiate the urine fertilized pumpkin from the non-fertilized.…”
Section: Flavor Quality Of the Pumpkinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the taste assessment test, 15 out of the 31 panelists could taste a difference between the pumpkins fertilized with urine and those fertilized with mineral fertilizer, but this was not statistically significant (Roessler et al 1978). However, 16/31 panelists could differentiate the urine fertilized pumpkin from the non-fertilized.…”
Section: Flavor Quality Of the Pumpkinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main analytical parameters of wines (alcohol, dry extract, titratable acidity, pH, tartaric acid, lactic acid, potassium, ash, total phenols, total anthocyanins, color intensity, color hue) were measured according to specified methods (OIV 2008). Sensory evaluations of wines were carried out by the duo-trio test (i.e., the panel must pick out the two identical wines among a group of three) and paired-preference test (Roessler et al 1978). A characterization test was also applied on 2007 wines to investigate the intensity of the different components of color, bouquet, and taste (Guinard andNoble 1986, Cravero andUbigli 2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data from the sensory test on the unheated miso-like seasoning were analyzed by the paired preference test (Roessler et al, 1978) and the data from the taste tests of the dishes were analyzed by the Tukey's multiple range test using the statistical analysis system SPSS. Other data were expressed as the meansϮ standard error.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%