1994
DOI: 10.1016/0266-1144(94)90048-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) geofoam: An introduction to material behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
74
0
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
4
74
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Geofoam has been acknowledged, relative to its low unit weight, as an attractive choice of substitute for earthfills in special infrastructure works, e.g., widened embankments, abutments or bridge approaches, retaining works and flexible pipeline backfills (Horvath 1994;Duskov 1997;Greeley 1997). The replacements with geofoam were able to mitigate the vertical stresses imposed onto underlying (difficult) soils (Horvath 1994(Horvath , 1997(Horvath , 2008Doskov 1997;Snow and Nickerson 2004) or flexible utilities pipelines, as well as to reduce the lateral stresses loaded onto the side-way earth structures (Hazarika and Okuzono 2004;Horvath 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Geofoam has been acknowledged, relative to its low unit weight, as an attractive choice of substitute for earthfills in special infrastructure works, e.g., widened embankments, abutments or bridge approaches, retaining works and flexible pipeline backfills (Horvath 1994;Duskov 1997;Greeley 1997). The replacements with geofoam were able to mitigate the vertical stresses imposed onto underlying (difficult) soils (Horvath 1994(Horvath , 1997(Horvath , 2008Doskov 1997;Snow and Nickerson 2004) or flexible utilities pipelines, as well as to reduce the lateral stresses loaded onto the side-way earth structures (Hazarika and Okuzono 2004;Horvath 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The replacements with geofoam were able to mitigate the vertical stresses imposed onto underlying (difficult) soils (Horvath 1994(Horvath , 1997(Horvath , 2008Doskov 1997;Snow and Nickerson 2004) or flexible utilities pipelines, as well as to reduce the lateral stresses loaded onto the side-way earth structures (Hazarika and Okuzono 2004;Horvath 2004). In practice, geofoam also demonstrated favorable performances in buffering mechanical impacts, e.g., swelling of expansive soil (Aytekin 1997;Ikizler et al 2008) and seismic vibrations (Riad and Horvath 2004;Zarnani et al 2009), as well as in mitigating thermal distresses in permafrost regions (Wen et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers have studied the properties of EPS geofoam. Horvath [7] divided a typical stress-strain curve from a short-term test of EPS into three key stages: the first stage exhibits linear-elastic behavior up to between 1 and 2% strain; the second stage includes yield which occurs at greater strain; the third stage features postyield work-hardening behavior. Manufacturers have also reported an elastic strain limit of 1% based on rapid uniaxial compression tests.…”
Section: Numerical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to [14] EPS beads are hydrophobic in nature and it has closed cell structure that prevents absorption of water in it. The EPS is a highly compressible material available in different types for specific purposereported by [15]. The mechanical characteristics of light-weight soils consisting of Expanded Polystyrene (EPS), dredged clays, and cement through both unconfined and triaxial compression tests was studied by [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%